From: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Vikash Garodia <quic_vgarodia@quicinc.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.k.varbanov@gmail.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] media: venus: provide video device lock
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 17:59:36 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230525085936.GD30543@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1eeb16e4-0812-b70b-df5a-1670c21a5221@xs4all.nl>
On (23/05/25 09:22), Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> Since these are m2m devices, I think this should set vfh->m2m_ctx->q_lock
> >> instead.
> >>
> >> The vb2_queue is per filehandle for such devices, so by just setting
> >> vdev->lock you will have all vb2_queues use the same mutex.
> >>
> >> Instead the struct v4l2_m2m_ctx q_lock pointer, if set, will use that
> >> mutex for all vb2 operations.
> >>
> >> I think you can set it to the 'lock' mutex in struct venus_inst.
> >
> > IIUC, the suggestion is to use the 'lock' in struct venus_inst while
> > initializing the queue. This might lead to deadlock as the same lock is used
> > during vb2 operations in driver. Might be introducing a new lock for this
> > purpose in struct venus_inst would do, unless we are trying to serialize at
> > video device (or core) context.
>
> For the record, I have not analyzed how that lock is used in the driver,
> so if a new mutex has to be added to venus_inst rather than reusing the
> existing one, then that's fine by me.
>
> But it should be a instance-specific mutex, not one at the device level.
Thanks for your help Hans. I added a per-instance queue mutex [1], so if
no one sees any problems with it then I can send a formal patch later on.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/20230525005312.GC30543@google.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-25 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-24 1:36 [PATCH] media: venus: provide video device lock Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-05-24 12:40 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-05-24 13:56 ` [PATCHv2] " Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-05-24 14:12 ` [PATCHv3] " Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-05-24 14:29 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2023-05-24 14:44 ` Hans Verkuil
2023-05-24 16:36 ` Vikash Garodia
2023-05-25 0:53 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-05-25 11:02 ` Vikash Garodia
2023-05-26 3:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-05-25 7:22 ` Hans Verkuil
2023-05-25 8:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2023-05-25 9:03 ` Hans Verkuil
2023-06-01 10:16 ` Vikash Garodia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230525085936.GD30543@google.com \
--to=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_vgarodia@quicinc.com \
--cc=stanimir.k.varbanov@gmail.com \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox