Re: [PATCH] MA-21654 Use dma_alloc_pages in vb2_dma_sg_alloc_compacted

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>]

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 09:21:15AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2023-09-26 07:51, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 05:54:26PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> As I mentioned before, I think it might make the most sense to make the
>>> whole thing into a "proper" dma_alloc_sgtable() function, which can then be
>>> used with dma_sync_sgtable_*() as dma_alloc_pages() is used with
>>> dma_sync_single_*() (and then dma_alloc_noncontiguous() clearly falls as
>>> the special in-between case).
>>
>> Why not just use dma_alloc_noncontiguous if the caller wants an sgtable
>> anyway?
>
> Because we don't need the restriction of the allocation being 
> DMA-contiguous (and thus having to fall back to physically-contiguous in 
> the absence of an IOMMU). That's what vb2_dma_contig already does, whereas 
> IIUC vb2_dma_sg is for devices which can handle genuine scatter-gather DMA 
> (and so are less likely to have an IOMMU, and more likely to need the best 
> shot at piecing together large allocations).

Let's just extent dma_alloc_noncontiguous with a max_dma_segments
parameter instead of adding yet another API.