From: Mengchi Cheng <mengcc@amazon.com>
To: <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>, <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, <kamatam@amazon.com>,
Mengchi Cheng <mengcc@amazon.com>
Subject: Inconsistent fence info between 6.1 and 5.15 kernel
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2023 16:50:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231121005014.4074003-1-mengcc@amazon.com> (raw)
Hello,
We are upleveling kernel from 5.15.32 to 6.1.62 for our system. The
kernels we use are all vanila kernel from upstream without any extra
patches. But we see our graphics application crashed in the 6.1.
And later we found that 6.1 has DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE option
added into dma_buf_ioctl. It initialized dma_fence_stub and returned
with a sync_file. So then our app called sync_file_ioctl_fence_info to
inquire fence info, it returns info of dma_fence_stub, which was not
expected. As the result, the app aborted because of it.
Meanwhile, with the 5.15 kernel, our app somehow also called
DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE. Since it returned -ENOTTY, the app did
not further ask for fence info.
I am not a graphics engineer. I do not know if userspace is handling
dma_fence_stub correctly. But since the addition of
DMA_BUF_IOCTL_EXPORT_SYNC_FILE is causing differnet behavior, I am
wondering if there is a way to keep things consistent in the kernel.
For example, add a macro to provide a choice disabling it? There is
probably a better solution to it. Look forward to your reply.
Best,
Mengchi Cheng
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2023-11-21 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-21 0:50 Mengchi Cheng [this message]
2023-11-21 8:17 ` Inconsistent fence info between 6.1 and 5.15 kernel Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231121005014.4074003-1-mengcc@amazon.com \
--to=mengcc@amazon.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=kamatam@amazon.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox