From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Intel Graphics Development" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add might_fault to drm_modeset_lock priming
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 11:31:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240710093120.732208-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> (raw)
We already teach lockdep that dma_resv nests within drm_modeset_lock,
but there's a lot more: All drm kms ioctl rely on being able to
put/get_user while holding modeset locks, so we really need a
might_fault in there too to complete the picture. Add it.
Motivated by a syzbot report that blew up on bcachefs doing an
unconditional console_lock way deep in the locking hierarchy, and
lockdep only noticing the depency loop in a drm ioctl instead of much
earlier. This annotation will make sure such issues have a much harder
time escaping.
References: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/00000000000073db8b061cd43496@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
index 568972258222..37d2e0a4ef4b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
@@ -456,6 +456,8 @@ int drmm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev)
if (ret == -EDEADLK)
ret = drm_modeset_backoff(&modeset_ctx);
+ might_fault();
+
ww_acquire_init(&resv_ctx, &reservation_ww_class);
ret = dma_resv_lock(&resv, &resv_ctx);
if (ret == -EDEADLK)
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-10 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-10 9:31 Daniel Vetter [this message]
2024-07-10 11:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: Add might_fault to drm_modeset_lock priming Christian König
2024-07-10 11:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2024-07-10 12:40 ` Christian König
2024-07-15 10:08 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240710093120.732208-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox