From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
To: "Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify calls to nvif_event_block()
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:02:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250424130254.42046-4-phasta@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250424130254.42046-2-phasta@kernel.org>
nouveau_fence_signal() returns a de-facto boolean to indicate when
nvif_event_block() shall be called.
The code can be made more compact and readable by calling
nvif_event_block() in nouveau_fence_update() directly.
Make those calls in nouveau_fence.c more canonical.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c | 31 +++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
index 761c174cb286..2b79bcb7da16 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_fence.c
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ nouveau_fctx(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
return container_of(fence->base.lock, struct nouveau_fence_chan, lock);
}
-static int
+static bool
nouveau_fence_signal(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
{
- int drop = 0;
+ bool drop = false;
dma_fence_signal_locked(&fence->base);
list_del(&fence->head);
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ nouveau_fence_signal(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx = nouveau_fctx(fence);
if (!--fctx->notify_ref)
- drop = 1;
+ drop = true;
}
dma_fence_put(&fence->base);
@@ -125,21 +125,23 @@ nouveau_fence_context_free(struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx)
kref_put(&fctx->fence_ref, nouveau_fence_context_put);
}
-static int
+static void
nouveau_fence_update(struct nouveau_channel *chan, struct nouveau_fence_chan *fctx)
{
struct nouveau_fence *fence, *tmp;
- int drop = 0;
+ bool drop = false;
u32 seq = fctx->read(chan);
list_for_each_entry_safe(fence, tmp, &fctx->pending, head) {
if ((int)(seq - fence->base.seqno) < 0)
break;
- drop |= nouveau_fence_signal(fence);
+ if (nouveau_fence_signal(fence))
+ drop = true;
}
- return drop;
+ if (drop)
+ nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
}
static void
@@ -150,18 +152,13 @@ nouveau_fence_uevent_work(struct work_struct *work)
struct nouveau_channel *chan;
struct nouveau_fence *fence;
unsigned long flags;
- int drop = 0;
spin_lock_irqsave(&fctx->lock, flags);
fence = list_first_entry_or_null(&fctx->pending, typeof(*fence), head);
if (fence) {
chan = rcu_dereference_protected(fence->channel, lockdep_is_held(&fctx->lock));
- if (nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx))
- drop = 1;
+ nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx);
}
- if (drop)
- nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
-
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fctx->lock, flags);
}
@@ -241,9 +238,7 @@ nouveau_fence_emit(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
return -ENODEV;
}
- if (nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx))
- nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
-
+ nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx);
list_add_tail(&fence->head, &fctx->pending);
spin_unlock_irq(&fctx->lock);
}
@@ -265,8 +260,8 @@ nouveau_fence_done(struct nouveau_fence *fence)
spin_lock_irqsave(&fctx->lock, flags);
chan = rcu_dereference_protected(fence->channel, lockdep_is_held(&fctx->lock));
- if (chan && nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx))
- nvif_event_block(&fctx->event);
+ if (chan)
+ nouveau_fence_update(chan, fctx);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fctx->lock, flags);
}
return dma_fence_is_signaled(&fence->base);
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-24 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 13:02 [PATCH 0/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify nouveau_fence.c Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/nouveau: nouveau_fence: Standardize list iterations Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:02 ` Philipp Stanner [this message]
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify nouveau_fence_done() Philipp Stanner
2025-04-28 14:43 ` Christian König
2025-04-24 13:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/nouveau: Check dma_fence in canonical way Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:24 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-24 13:25 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-04-24 13:34 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-04-28 14:45 ` Christian König
2025-05-08 9:13 ` Philipp Stanner
2025-05-08 9:54 ` Christian König
2025-05-16 14:10 ` [PATCH 0/4] drm/nouveau: Simplify nouveau_fence.c Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250424130254.42046-4-phasta@kernel.org \
--to=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox