From: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Logan Gunthorpe" <logang@deltatee.com>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
"Ankit Agrawal" <ankita@nvidia.com>,
"Yishai Hadas" <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
"Shameer Kolothum" <skolothumtho@nvidia.com>,
"Kevin Tian" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Krishnakant Jaju" <kjaju@nvidia.com>,
"Matt Ochs" <mochs@nvidia.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, "Alex Mastro" <amastro@fb.com>,
"Nicolin Chen" <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/11] vfio/nvgrace: Support get_dmabuf_phys
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 13:05:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110130534.4d4b17ad.alex@shazbot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106-dmabuf-vfio-v7-11-2503bf390699@nvidia.com>
On Thu, 6 Nov 2025 16:16:56 +0200
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>
> Call vfio_pci_core_fill_phys_vec() with the proper physical ranges for the
> synthetic BAR 2 and BAR 4 regions. Otherwise use the normal flow based on
> the PCI bar.
>
> This demonstrates a DMABUF that follows the region info report to only
> allow mapping parts of the region that are mmapable. Since the BAR is
> power of two sized and the "CXL" region is just page aligned the there can
> be a padding region at the end that is not mmaped or passed into the
> DMABUF.
>
> The "CXL" ranges that are remapped into BAR 2 and BAR 4 areas are not PCI
> MMIO, they actually run over the CXL-like coherent interconnect and for
> the purposes of DMA behave identically to DRAM. We don't try to model this
> distinction between true PCI BAR memory that takes a real PCI path and the
> "CXL" memory that takes a different path in the p2p framework for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Alex Mastro <amastro@fb.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c
> index e346392b72f6..7d7ab2c84018 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/nvgrace-gpu/main.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> #include <linux/vfio_pci_core.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/jiffies.h>
> +#include <linux/pci-p2pdma.h>
>
> /*
> * The device memory usable to the workloads running in the VM is cached
> @@ -683,6 +684,54 @@ nvgrace_gpu_write(struct vfio_device *core_vdev,
> return vfio_pci_core_write(core_vdev, buf, count, ppos);
> }
>
> +static int nvgrace_get_dmabuf_phys(struct vfio_pci_core_device *core_vdev,
> + struct p2pdma_provider **provider,
> + unsigned int region_index,
> + struct dma_buf_phys_vec *phys_vec,
> + struct vfio_region_dma_range *dma_ranges,
> + size_t nr_ranges)
> +{
> + struct nvgrace_gpu_pci_core_device *nvdev = container_of(
> + core_vdev, struct nvgrace_gpu_pci_core_device, core_device);
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = core_vdev->pdev;
> +
> + if (nvdev->resmem.memlength && region_index == RESMEM_REGION_INDEX) {
> + /*
> + * The P2P properties of the non-BAR memory is the same as the
> + * BAR memory, so just use the provider for index 0. Someday
> + * when CXL gets P2P support we could create CXLish providers
> + * for the non-BAR memory.
> + */
> + *provider = pcim_p2pdma_provider(pdev, 0);
> + if (!*provider)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return vfio_pci_core_fill_phys_vec(phys_vec, dma_ranges,
> + nr_ranges,
> + nvdev->resmem.memphys,
> + nvdev->resmem.memlength);
> + } else if (region_index == USEMEM_REGION_INDEX) {
> + /*
> + * This is actually cachable memory and isn't treated as P2P in
> + * the chip. For now we have no way to push cachable memory
> + * through everything and the Grace HW doesn't care what caching
> + * attribute is programmed into the SMMU. So use BAR 0.
> + */
> + *provider = pcim_p2pdma_provider(pdev, 0);
> + if (!*provider)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + return vfio_pci_core_fill_phys_vec(phys_vec, dma_ranges,
> + nr_ranges,
> + nvdev->usemem.memphys,
> + nvdev->usemem.memlength);
> + }
> + return vfio_pci_core_get_dmabuf_phys(core_vdev, provider, region_index,
> + phys_vec, dma_ranges, nr_ranges);
> +}
Unless my eyes deceive, we could reduce the redundancy a bit:
struct mem_region *mem_region = NULL;
if (nvdev->resmem.memlength && region_index == RESMEM_REGION_INDEX) {
/*
* The P2P properties of the non-BAR memory is the same as the
* BAR memory, so just use the provider for index 0. Someday
* when CXL gets P2P support we could create CXLish providers
* for the non-BAR memory.
*/
mem_region = &nvdev->resmem;
} else if (region_index == USEMEM_REGION_INDEX) {
/*
* This is actually cachable memory and isn't treated as P2P in
* the chip. For now we have no way to push cachable memory
* through everything and the Grace HW doesn't care what caching
* attribute is programmed into the SMMU. So use BAR 0.
*/
mem_region = &nvdev->usemem;
}
if (mem_region) {
*provider = pcim_p2pdma_provider(pdev, 0);
if (!*provider)
return -EINVAL;
return vfio_pci_core_fill_phys_vec(phys_vec, dma_ranges,
nr_ranges,
mem_region->memphys,
mem_region->memlength);
}
return vfio_pci_core_get_dmabuf_phys(core_vdev, provider, region_index,
phys_vec, dma_ranges, nr_ranges);
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 14:16 [PATCH v7 00/11] vfio/pci: Allow MMIO regions to be exported through dma-buf Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-06 14:16 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] PCI/P2PDMA: Separate the mmap() support from the core logic Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-06 14:16 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] PCI/P2PDMA: Simplify bus address mapping API Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-06 14:16 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] PCI/P2PDMA: Refactor to separate core P2P functionality from memory allocation Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-06 14:16 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] PCI/P2PDMA: Provide an access to pci_p2pdma_map_type() function Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-06 14:16 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] PCI/P2PDMA: Document DMABUF model Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-07 6:15 ` Randy Dunlap
2025-11-07 16:01 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-07 18:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2025-11-07 20:27 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-06 14:16 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] dma-buf: provide phys_vec to scatter-gather mapping routine Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-06 14:16 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] vfio: Export vfio device get and put registration helpers Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-06 14:16 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] vfio/pci: Share the core device pointer while invoking feature functions Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-06 14:16 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] vfio/pci: Enable peer-to-peer DMA transactions by default Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-06 14:16 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] vfio/pci: Add dma-buf export support for MMIO regions Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-10 20:05 ` Alex Williamson
2025-11-06 14:16 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] vfio/nvgrace: Support get_dmabuf_phys Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-10 20:05 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2025-11-10 20:28 ` Leon Romanovsky
2025-11-10 20:42 ` [PATCH v7 00/11] vfio/pci: Allow MMIO regions to be exported through dma-buf Alex Williamson
2025-11-11 8:54 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251110130534.4d4b17ad.alex@shazbot.org \
--to=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amastro@fb.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kjaju@nvidia.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skolothumtho@nvidia.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).