From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:45870 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758716Ab2IMSLp (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:11:45 -0400 From: Federico Vaga To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Hans Verkuil , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Pawel Osciak , Marek Szyprowski , Hans Verkuil , Giancarlo Asnaghi , linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] videobuf2-dma-streaming: new videobuf2 memory allocator Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 20:14:57 +0200 Message-ID: <2025764.e9gFDuMQWu@harkonnen> In-Reply-To: <20120913115438.0557462f@lwn.net> References: <1347544368-30583-1-git-send-email-federico.vaga@gmail.com> <17733334.UmoCxqVfBu@harkonnen> <20120913115438.0557462f@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Well, there is some documentation here: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/447435/ I know this, I learned from this page :) What I'm saying is that I don't know what to write inside the code to make it clearer than now. I think is clear, because if you know the videobuf2, you know what I'm doing in each vb2_mem_ops. I suppose that this is the reason why there are no comments inside the other memory allocator. Maybe I am wrong. -- Federico Vaga