From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 391A81D63E4 for ; Sat, 30 May 2026 18:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780166991; cv=none; b=uAxUdw2NzzLTRzQqubmET9xPmMDZgVrefIZR7ql360GsABS4IeUjQRfmljJYLV6JEdveNdrwO3dFVq85QfrCwqn+0Ky6j4+vT26oMBA/slCUze8rVxN+auUc9DQAJAONRBpoZ89P1eQ95tWkra3K56RFI4W0FFd0q+bPsTQZ6R0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780166991; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4HGzWH3eYdvzPWBRkxAB+CQsPs7s9sDREb4PVPPmA44=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jvcOnKtmc2JzonhZ5uAAfNvEIquHgQc6JeLxftbjm5iDaimMmEkdLFfW8LCVJgvDQF3CziqFwYskEikhjFHh5VqGOOJ5jOydgOrUU/Tk9kbkQCxmIo5O6+c+0f8SrKjD9Pd39s/WCd+9uDgPqcainFT9G3newWbShKv9FiiI8PM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=B1RGXnUo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="B1RGXnUo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E8571F00898; Sat, 30 May 2026 18:49:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780166990; bh=pg4OBm/UHh+7fflnrcjyUzAFqWRnHOb7i1lltJfil80=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=B1RGXnUoi6qfPIYqYikjQvWhLndsu5DLsvVLVVzhdQVFS3ydiflC3MSuqLKTHfJmU RFbwIMo1HyexeSiT3zDHfoIwFwWysRH5oU2wSDzVdOnhu6wKFLT+4CJKHBNaNlVTri TuX5BA207741Vfot8fuc/mDe3KV6vQ0twtuL1nrN4+ynbJjyjnAoeX9lrfIVB+MzAE Kyx+9RYa/xWs2wvtJNh+vcqJbz2Yj5eR0RJjR3gXNjDIY9rYyTAPqwLWeBaLgTNPh0 2VCsvHBJRVHGFUCiUa5Py83zL2NfMdNgTq/CxfXB8IPsex3D8+/9ZRTRrl68+3b1Gx +Uohz7APzvU7g== Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 20:49:45 +0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Roman Gushchin Cc: Derek Barbosa , Konstantin Ryabitsev , Jason Gunthorpe , Steven Rostedt , users@kernel.org, Linux Media Mailing List Subject: Re: Linking Patchwork with Sashiko? Message-ID: <20260530204945.22ac92c6@foz.lan> In-Reply-To: <20260530200017.0fe7f685@foz.lan> References: <20260530103004.6fe2ffa7@foz.lan> <7E971C76-0568-43EF-9EE7-C8DB78C45CA1@linux.dev> <20260530200017.0fe7f685@foz.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 30 May 2026 20:00:17 +0200 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > On Sat, 30 May 2026 08:57:13 -0700 > Roman Gushchin wrote: > > > Hi Mauro! > > > > My understanding is that some subsystems might be interested in having patchwork integration > > without Sashiko sending reviews over the email. Most notable, net. Also mptcp. > > Well, you can use my scripts to do such integration > (https://github.com/mchehab/pw_tools). Btw, I'm running my script here, making it use kernel.org. On some patches that are c/c to media, I can update status with my user, as I'm marked as maintainer there, like on those: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20251220192210.399423-1-szymonwilczek@gmx.com/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/bf19e526-3327-46a5-8ecd-4baaadef5bcf@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp/ but on others, it fails: ERROR: 14589154: sashiko failed to set 'warning': 403 Client Error: Forbidden for url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/api/patches/14589154/checks/ In total, it was able to update 160 patches. At the media instance, ~230 patches were updated using the same maildir directory. Looking on this patch, for instance: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20260530143541.229628-3-phasta@kernel.org/ https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20260530143541.229628-3-phasta@kernel.org/ (patch is actually for Rust, but it was c/c to linux-media, so it appears at linux-media project) and on this: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-media/patch/20260530094326.11892-2-linux.amoon@gmail.com/ https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20260530094326.11892-2-linux.amoon@gmail.com/ (patch is actually for linux-media, but was c/c to other mailing lists as well) Both were updated on linuxtv.org (as there's just one Kernel project there), but they were not updated at kernel.org. What I *suspect* is that patches which are copied to multiple e-mails are problematic. Thanks, Mauro