Linux Media Controller development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andrew Soto" <linux@notrealandy.dev>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: media: atomisp: prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2026 23:57:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260606235721.87D501F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260606234427.9902-1-linux@notrealandy.dev>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Ignored memory allocation failure leads to null-equivalent pointer passed to SP firmware.
--

commit 967be0a2dfa51f2c0edc88c4aa3976bc41aab85d
Author: Andrew Soto <linux@notrealandy.dev>

staging: media: atomisp: prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply

This commit replaces a raw multiplication inside kzalloc() with a kcalloc()
array allocation in sh_css_params.c. This validates the array size
calculations to prevent potential integer overflow vulnerabilities before
interacting with the kernel heap allocator.

> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_params.c b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_params.c
> index fcebace11daf6..9147ca0474ad2 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_params.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_params.c
> @@ -3716,7 +3716,7 @@ ia_css_ptr sh_css_store_sp_group_to_ddr(void)
>  
>  	IA_CSS_ENTER_LEAVE_PRIVATE("void");
>  
> -	write_buf = kzalloc(sizeof(u8) * 8192, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	write_buf = kcalloc(8192, sizeof(u8), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!write_buf)
>  		return 0;

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is it possible that this early
return causes the firmware to crash under memory pressure?

If kcalloc() fails, sh_css_store_sp_group_to_ddr() returns 0, which acts as
a null-equivalent for an ia_css_ptr.

Looking at the caller in drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/sh_css_sp.c:

store_sp_group_data() {
    ...
    per_frame_data.sp_group_addr = sh_css_store_sp_group_to_ddr();
    ...
}

The return value is unconditionally assigned to per_frame_data.sp_group_addr
without any validation. When this 0 is sent directly to the per-frame
hardware configuration, will the SP firmware crash or lock up the hardware
when attempting to access address 0 for its group configuration?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260606234427.9902-1-linux@notrealandy.dev?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-06 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-06 23:44 [PATCH] staging: media: atomisp: prefer kcalloc over kzalloc with multiply Andrew Soto
2026-06-06 23:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-07  7:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-06-07 12:18 ` [PATCH v2] " Andrew Soto

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260606235721.87D501F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@notrealandy.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox