From: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
To: "Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Document weird looking bugfix
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 10:26:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610082602.1292853-2-phasta@kernel.org> (raw)
commit c8a5d5ea3ba6 ("nouveau: fix client work fence deletion race")
fixed a race. To do so, it replaced the automatically locking
dma_fence_is_signaled() with manual locks plus
dma_fence_is_signaled_locked().
For someone browsing through the code, this reads very much like a
cleanup or rework leftover. Future contributors and / or new maintainers
not familiar with the history might be tempted to remove that bugfix.
Document the bugfix.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
---
(I did not test this)
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
index 42a81166f3a9..519a0c164a72 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c
@@ -159,6 +159,13 @@ nouveau_cli_work_ready(struct dma_fence *fence)
unsigned long flags;
bool ret = true;
+ /*
+ * This is not a cleanup / rework leftover, but a bugfix to prevent a
+ * race with someone signalling the fence. The locked
+ * dma_fence_is_signaled() cannot be used. The dma_fence implementation
+ * is not fully synchronized with locks, but also uses atomic bits,
+ * which can cause the dma_fence_put() below to be executed too soon.
+ */
dma_fence_lock_irqsave(fence, flags);
if (!dma_fence_is_signaled_locked(fence))
ret = false;
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 8:26 Philipp Stanner [this message]
2026-06-10 9:12 ` [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Document weird looking bugfix Christian König
2026-06-10 12:12 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610082602.1292853-2-phasta@kernel.org \
--to=phasta@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox