From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@gmail.com>,
Frank Zago <frank@zago.net>, Olivier Lorin <o.lorin@laposte.net>,
Erik Andren <erik.andren@gmail.com>,
Brian Johnson <brijohn@gmail.com>,
Leandro Costantino <lcostantino@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] media: usb: gspca: remove driver for old webcams
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 11:40:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260927114015.37cfe3b2.michal.pecio@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d6cf632-0c6a-4f93-8c63-2abb7cacdeac@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:29:10 +0200, johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23-Sep-26 09:32, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > The gspca driver supports a large number of old non-UVC webcams
> > that use proprietary formats.
> >
> > These webcams are poorly maintained, have very poor image quality,
> > and there is no use-case for them anymore since even the cheapest
> > UVC webcam will be better than these.
> >
> > The last time there was a 'real' change to gspca was in 2021, one in
> > 2019 and one in 2018.
> >
> > We see an uptick in the number of suspected AI patches in this
> > driver, and I really don't want to waste time on that.
Well, quietly ignoring AI slop is an option I guess.
> > So let's remove this driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>
>
> As someone who did a lot of work on gspca I'm a bit sad to see this
> go, with that said I understand why you're doing this and I think it
> likely is for the best.
>
> The only worry I have is that some of the earlier builtin laptop USB
> webcams might not all have been UVC and replacing the builtin cam is
> no were near as easy as replacing an external one.
That was my first thought too, because I have a laptop with m5602 IIRC.
But TBH this laptop mostly just gathers dust nowadays, so IDK how much
people still care about these drivers.
Regards,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-27 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 7:32 [RFC PATCH] media: usb: gspca: remove driver for old webcams Hans Verkuil
2026-09-23 7:43 ` Hans Verkuil
2026-09-23 7:51 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-30 9:59 ` Hans Verkuil
2026-09-30 12:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-23 15:29 ` johannes.goede
2026-09-27 9:40 ` Michal Pecio [this message]
2026-09-30 10:27 ` Hans Verkuil
2026-10-02 8:35 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260927114015.37cfe3b2.michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=brijohn@gmail.com \
--cc=enelsonmoore@gmail.com \
--cc=erik.andren@gmail.com \
--cc=frank@zago.net \
--cc=hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=lcostantino@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=o.lorin@laposte.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox