Linux Media Controller development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>,
	Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Ethan Nelson-Moore <enelsonmoore@gmail.com>,
	Frank Zago <frank@zago.net>, Olivier Lorin <o.lorin@laposte.net>,
	Erik Andren <erik.andren@gmail.com>,
	Brian Johnson <brijohn@gmail.com>,
	Leandro Costantino <lcostantino@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] media: usb: gspca: remove driver for old webcams
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2026 11:40:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260927114015.37cfe3b2.michal.pecio@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d6cf632-0c6a-4f93-8c63-2abb7cacdeac@oss.qualcomm.com>

On Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:29:10 +0200, johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com
wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 23-Sep-26 09:32, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> > The gspca driver supports a large number of old non-UVC webcams
> > that use proprietary formats.
> > 
> > These webcams are poorly maintained, have very poor image quality,
> > and there is no use-case for them anymore since even the cheapest
> > UVC webcam will be better than these.
> > 
> > The last time there was a 'real' change to gspca was in 2021, one in
> > 2019 and one in 2018.
> > 
> > We see an uptick in the number of suspected AI patches in this
> > driver, and I really don't want to waste time on that.

Well, quietly ignoring AI slop is an option I guess.
 
> > So let's remove this driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org>  
> 
> As someone who did a lot of work on gspca I'm a bit sad to see this
> go, with that said I understand why you're doing this and I think it
> likely is for the best.
> 
> The only worry I have is that some of the earlier builtin laptop USB
> webcams might not all have been UVC and replacing the builtin cam is
> no were near as easy as replacing an external one.

That was my first thought too, because I have a laptop with m5602 IIRC.

But TBH this laptop mostly just gathers dust nowadays, so IDK how much
people still care about these drivers.

Regards,
Michal

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-27  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-23  7:32 [RFC PATCH] media: usb: gspca: remove driver for old webcams Hans Verkuil
2026-09-23  7:43 ` Hans Verkuil
2026-09-23  7:51 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-30  9:59   ` Hans Verkuil
2026-09-30 12:15     ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-09-23 15:29 ` johannes.goede
2026-09-27  9:40   ` Michal Pecio [this message]
2026-09-30 10:27   ` Hans Verkuil
2026-10-02  8:35     ` Hans de Goede

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260927114015.37cfe3b2.michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=brijohn@gmail.com \
    --cc=enelsonmoore@gmail.com \
    --cc=erik.andren@gmail.com \
    --cc=frank@zago.net \
    --cc=hverkuil+cisco@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes.goede@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=lcostantino@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=o.lorin@laposte.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox