From: Alex Williamson <alex@shazbot.org>
To: Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org>
Cc: "Leon Romanovsky" <leon@kernel.org>,
"Jason Gunthorpe" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"Alex Mastro" <amastro@fb.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Kevin Tian" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"Pranjal Shrivastava" <praan@google.com>,
"Longfang Liu" <liulongfang@huawei.com>,
"Mahmoud Adam" <mngyadam@amazon.de>,
"David Matlack" <dmatlack@google.com>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"Ankit Agrawal" <ankita@nvidia.com>,
"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Vivek Kasireddy" <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, alex@shazbot.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/9] vfio/pci: Remove DMABUF export dependency on vdev->memory_lock
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:14:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261013171416.40b00e73@shazbot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006193643.76330-2-matt@ozlabs.org>
On Tue, 6 Oct 2026 20:36:29 +0100
Matt Evans <matt@ozlabs.org> wrote:
> The VFIO_DEVICE_FEATURE_DMA_BUF export previously used
> vdev->memory_lock to protect VFIO's list of exported DMABUFs
> (vdev->dmabufs) and their revocation status. When adding a new
> export, memory_lock was taken for write.
>
> A future commit will refactor DMABUF export into a function used from
> mmap(), which would create a new mmap_lock -> memory_lock dependency.
>
> In preparation, this commit introduces a vdev->dmabuf_lock that
> protects the dmabufs list, per-DMABUF revocation state, and a new
> bars_revoked flag. The flag tracks the device-wide BAR revocation
> state set via vfio_pci_dma_buf_move() under dmabuf_lock, removing the
> test of __vfio_pci_memory_enabled() and dependency on
> vdev->memory_lock.
There's a subtle change here that I'm not sure is worth mentioning, so
I'll at least put it on the list for posterity. The initial revoked
state of a newly minted DMABUF is now governed by the device-wide BAR
revocation state set via vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(). This is subtly
different from the current behavior where the initial state is based on
instantaneous BAR accessibility tested under vdev->memory_lock. Thanks,
Alex
> This is a cleanup currently, but allows the future export path to
> avoid holding memory_lock under mmap_lock and a therefore avoid a
> deadlock scenario (a fault handler attempting to take mmap_lock in a
> vfio-pci variant driver thread that holds memory_lock, vs another
> thread doing an mmap/export holding them both in the other order).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-06 19:36 [PATCH v8 0/9] vfio/pci: Add mmap() for DMABUFs Matt Evans
2026-10-06 19:36 ` [PATCH v8 1/9] vfio/pci: Remove DMABUF export dependency on vdev->memory_lock Matt Evans
2026-10-13 23:14 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2026-10-06 19:36 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] vfio/pci: Un-revoke DMABUFs in LOW_POWER_ENTRY_WITH_WAKEUP resume Matt Evans
2026-10-06 19:36 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] dma-buf: Provide dma_buf_set_name() Matt Evans
2026-10-07 9:22 ` Christian König
2026-10-12 6:27 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-10-06 19:36 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] vfio/pci: Add a helper to look up PFNs for DMABUFs Matt Evans
2026-10-13 23:14 ` Alex Williamson
2026-10-06 19:36 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] vfio/pci: Add a helper to create a DMABUF for a BAR-map VMA Matt Evans
2026-10-06 19:36 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] vfio/pci: Convert BAR mmap() to use a DMABUF Matt Evans
2026-10-06 19:36 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] vfio/pci: Clean up BAR zap and revocation Matt Evans
2026-10-13 23:13 ` Alex Williamson
2026-10-06 19:36 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] vfio/pci: Support mmap() of a VFIO DMABUF Matt Evans
2026-10-13 23:13 ` Alex Williamson
2026-10-06 19:36 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] vfio/pci: Revoke a DMABUF on request from userspace Matt Evans
2026-10-13 23:13 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261013171416.40b00e73@shazbot.org \
--to=alex@shazbot.org \
--cc=amastro@fb.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liulongfang@huawei.com \
--cc=matt@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mngyadam@amazon.de \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox