Linux Media Controller development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>,
	"Sumit Semwal" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Yury Norov" <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Stanner <phasta@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf/dma-fence: Order setting of the signaled-bit properly
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 09:34:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202610260958.IcV50YNq-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021095512.1345191-4-phasta@kernel.org>

Hi Philipp,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on 1ecab8b0bad393750c60cc3819ce9c256595463c]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Philipp-Stanner/asm-generic-bitops-Add-set_bit_release/20261021-115512
base:   1ecab8b0bad393750c60cc3819ce9c256595463c
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261021095512.1345191-4-phasta%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf/dma-fence: Order setting of the signaled-bit properly
config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261026/202610260958.IcV50YNq-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 16.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20261026/202610260958.IcV50YNq-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202610260958.IcV50YNq-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c: In function 'dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked':
>> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c:393:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_bit_release'; did you mean 'seq_release'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     393 |         set_bit_release(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags);
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |         seq_release


vim +393 drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c

   337	
   338	/**
   339	 * dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked - signal completion of a fence
   340	 * @fence: the fence to signal
   341	 * @timestamp: fence signal timestamp in kernel's CLOCK_MONOTONIC time domain
   342	 *
   343	 * Signal completion for software callbacks on a fence, this will unblock
   344	 * dma_fence_wait() calls and run all the callbacks added with
   345	 * dma_fence_add_callback(). Can be called multiple times, but since a fence
   346	 * can only go from the unsignaled to the signaled state and not back, it will
   347	 * only be effective the first time. Set the timestamp provided as the fence
   348	 * signal timestamp.
   349	 *
   350	 * Unlike dma_fence_signal_timestamp(), this function must be called with
   351	 * &dma_fence.lock held.
   352	 */
   353	void dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked(struct dma_fence *fence,
   354					      ktime_t timestamp)
   355	{
   356		const struct dma_fence_ops *ops;
   357		struct dma_fence_cb *cur, *tmp;
   358		struct list_head cb_list;
   359	
   360		dma_fence_assert_held(fence);
   361	
   362		if (unlikely(dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(fence)))
   363			return;
   364	
   365		trace_dma_fence_signaled(fence);
   366	
   367		/*
   368		 * When neither a release nor a wait operation is specified set the ops
   369		 * pointer to NULL to allow the fence structure to become independent
   370		 * from who originally issued it.
   371		 */
   372		ops = rcu_dereference_protected(fence->ops, true);
   373		if (!ops->release && !ops->wait)
   374			RCU_INIT_POINTER(fence->ops, NULL);
   375	
   376		/* Stash the cb_list before replacing it with the timestamp */
   377		list_replace(&fence->cb_list, &cb_list);
   378	
   379		fence->timestamp = timestamp;
   380		set_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT, &fence->flags);
   381	
   382		list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, tmp, &cb_list, node) {
   383			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cur->node);
   384			cur->func(fence, cur);
   385		}
   386	
   387		/*
   388		 * This orders the signaled-state with the test_bit_acquire() in
   389		 * dma_fence_test_signaled_flag(). This ensures that functions like
   390		 * dma_fence_is_signaled() can only ever return true once signaling is
   391		 * completed (i.e., after the callbacks above ran).
   392		 */
 > 393		set_bit_release(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT, &fence->flags);
   394	}
   395	EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_signal_timestamp_locked);
   396	

--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-26  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-21  9:55 [PATCH 0/2] dma-fence: Order is-signaled-bit Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21  9:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] asm-generic/bitops: Add set_bit_release() Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 11:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-21 11:54     ` Gary Guo
2026-10-21 12:15       ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-10-21 12:06   ` Gary Guo
2026-10-21 12:17     ` Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 12:24       ` Gary Guo
2026-10-21 13:22         ` Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21  9:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] dma-buf/dma-fence: Order setting of the signaled-bit properly Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 13:47   ` Christian König
2026-10-21 14:52     ` Philipp Stanner
2026-10-21 15:04       ` Christian König
2026-10-26  1:34   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-10-26  7:48   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202610260958.IcV50YNq-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=phasta@kernel.org \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox