From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([95.142.166.194]:40274 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752956Ab3JRVGY (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:06:24 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fwd: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 23:06:45 +0200 Message-ID: <2080835.ZUJprPZOry@avalon> In-Reply-To: <20131015160657.GE25034@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20131015160657.GE25034@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Russell, On Tuesday 15 October 2013 17:06:57 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Bad move. Wrong status indeed. I wasn't planning to apply the patch through my tree as it's part of a much larger series. Sorry for the noise. > ----- Forwarded message from Patchwork ----- > > Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:58:03 -0000 > From: Patchwork > To: rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk > Subject: [linux-media] Patch notification: 1 patch updated > Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 16:58:09 +0100 > > Hello, > > The following patch (submitted by you) has been updated in patchwork: > > * linux-media: [31/51] DMA-API: media: omap3isp: use > dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/20178/ > - for: Linux Media kernel patches > was: New > now: Accepted > > This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond. > > - > > Patches submitted to linux-media@vger.kernel.org have the following > possible states: > > New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches); > > Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically, > the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork > doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer. > If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the > MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML; > > Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the > same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first > version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was > superseeded by a git pull request. > > Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't > exist anymore. > > Changes requested: when someone requests changes at the patch; > > Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the > time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing > for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch. > > RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the > patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes: > - patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches > via git pull requests; > - patches with a very active community (typically from developers > working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are > needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be > happy with. > > Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applicable via > the media-tree.git. > > Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied > via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied > either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree; > some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems, > etc); > > If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML. > > - > > This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at > patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit > your mail settings at: > http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/ > > ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart