public inbox for linux-media@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>, pawel@osciak.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v4l2-ctrl: fix setting volatile controls
Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 17:51:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2421409.LVIZ41ySbB@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520379EC.9020307@xs4all.nl>

Hi Hans,

Thank you for the patch.

On Thursday 08 August 2013 12:58:52 Hans Verkuil wrote:
> The V4L2 specification allows setting volatile controls as that is needed
> if you want to be able to set all controls in one go using
> VIDIOC_S_EXT_CTRLS.
> 
> However, such new values should be ignored by the control framework
> since it makes no sense to set a volatile control. While the new value
> will be ignored anyway, it does generate a bogus 'change value' control
> event that should be suppressed.
> 
> This patch changes the code to skip setting volatile controls, except for
> one particular case where an autocluster switches to manual mode, because
> that causes the volatile controls to become non-volatile, so the new
> specified values should be retained.
> 
> Note that the values returned by VIDIOC_S_CTRL and VIDIOC_S_EXT_CTRLS for
> such skipped volatile controls will be the currently cached values and not
> the latest volatile value. This is something that might have to be fixed
> as well in the future should that be necessary. I think it is overkill,
> though.

This restriction is not documented in Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-
controls.txt. Do we really want to assume that all volatile controls are read-
only and/or inactive ?

> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
> Cc: pawel@osciak.com
> ---
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c index fccd08b..a7cd830 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-ctrls.c
> @@ -2592,6 +2592,7 @@ static int try_set_ext_ctrls(struct v4l2_fh *fh,
> struct v4l2_ctrl_handler *hdl, cs->error_idx = cs->count;
>  	for (i = 0; !ret && i < cs->count; i++) {
>  		struct v4l2_ctrl *master;
> +		bool set_volatiles = false;
>  		u32 idx = i;
> 
>  		if (helpers[i].mref == NULL)
> @@ -2627,14 +2628,24 @@ static int try_set_ext_ctrls(struct v4l2_fh *fh,
> struct v4l2_ctrl_handler *hdl, } while (tmp_idx);
>  			/* If the new value == the manual value, then copy
>  			   the current volatile values. */
> -			if (new_auto_val == master->manual_mode_value)
> +			if (new_auto_val == master->manual_mode_value) {
>  				update_from_auto_cluster(master);
> +				set_volatiles = true;
> +			}
>  		}
> 
>  		/* Copy the new caller-supplied control values.
>  		   user_to_new() sets 'is_new' to 1. */
>  		do {
> -			ret = user_to_new(cs->controls + idx, helpers[idx].ctrl);
> +			/*
> +			 * Skip attempts to set volatile controls since those are
> +			 * ignored anyway. The exception is when an autocluster is
> +			 * switched to manual mode, since in that case the specified
> +			 * 'volatile' controls are actually the new manual
> +			 * non-volatile values.
> +			 */
> +			if (set_volatiles || !(helpers[idx].ctrl->flags &
> V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_VOLATILE)) +				ret = user_to_new(cs->controls + 
idx,
> helpers[idx].ctrl);
>  			idx = helpers[idx].next;
>  		} while (!ret && idx);
> 
> @@ -2697,6 +2708,9 @@ static int set_ctrl(struct v4l2_fh *fh, struct
> v4l2_ctrl *ctrl, if (ctrl->type == V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_STRING)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> 
> +	if (ctrl->flags & V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_VOLATILE)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	/* Reset the 'is_new' flags of the cluster */
>  	for (i = 0; i < master->ncontrols; i++)
>  		if (master->cluster[i])
-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


      reply	other threads:[~2013-08-08 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-08 10:58 [PATCH] v4l2-ctrl: fix setting volatile controls Hans Verkuil
2013-08-08 15:51 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2421409.LVIZ41ySbB@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pawel@osciak.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox