Aw: Re: v4l-utils, dvb-utils, xawtv and alevt

[hermann-pitton@arcor.de]

 


----- Original Nachricht ----
Von:     Chicken Shack <chicken.shack@gmx.de>
An:      hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@arcor.de>
Datum:   14.03.2010 12:13
Betreff: Re: v4l-utils, dvb-utils, xawtv and alevt

> Am Sonntag, den 14.03.2010, 06:39 +0100 schrieb hermann pitton:
> > Am Samstag, den 13.03.2010, 14:43 +0100 schrieb Chicken Shack:
> > > Am Samstag, den 13.03.2010, 13:34 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On 03/13/2010 11:15 AM, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > > > > Am Samstag, den 13.03.2010, 07:51 +0100 schrieb Hans de Goede:
> > > > >> Hi,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 03/12/2010 08:10 PM, Chicken Shack wrote:
> > > > >>> 1. Alevt 1.7.0 is not just another tool, but it is instead a
> > > > >>> self-contained videotext application consisting of three parts:
> > > > >>> a. alevt, b. alevt-date c. alevt-cap
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> While the packed size of alevt is 78770 the complete size of the
> > > > >>> dvb-apps as a whole ranges around 350000.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I am not against hosting this program at linuxtv.org, but if this
> > > > >>> decision is made the decision should be an intelligent one: alevt
> is a
> > > > >>> separate tree, and any other choice is simply a dumb one.
> > > > >>> Alevt-1.7.0 needs a lot of external dependencies, while the
> dvb-apps
> > > > >>> only need the libc6.
> > 
> > More clever would have been never to rename it from alevt-dvb to alevt.
> > On the prior you don't have any rights and I seriously doubt you have
> > any on the later.
> 
> Only a pure brainless idiot who understands less than nothing can rant
> crap like this.....
> 
> Typical Pitton, typical no-brain quality....
> 
> > 
> > > > > Good morning Hans,
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Good afternoon :)
> > > > 
> > > > > Definitely not.
> > > > > 3.95 is analogue only and thus is discontinued as version.
> > > > > 4.0 pre is the alpha-state tarball that you can get here:
> > 
> > No, 3.95 is "official" and right for patching and 4x was never released.
> 
> See above.....
> 
> > I pointed to mpeg4ip only as a joke.
> > 
> > > > Ah, ok. Well I must honestly say I've no interest in that I'm doing
> > > > package maintenance for the 3.95 release in Fedora and I know it
> > > > needs a lot of patching, AFAIK other distros are doing the same,
> > > > so it would be good to have / become a new upstream for xawtv 3.95,
> > > > to have a place to gather all the distro patches mostly and release
> > > > that, and where new patches if needed can accumulate and new
> > > > releases can be done from.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > http://dl.bytesex.org/cvs-snapshots/xawtv-20081014-100645.tar.gz
> > > > >
> > > > > Inofficial end of development somewhere in 2005 or 2006, last
> external
> > > > > contribution from October 2008.
> > 
> > It was on March 08 2005. You even don't know that?
> 
> Completely irrelevant, stupid moron!
> 
> > http://linux.bytesex.org/v4l2/maintainer.txt
> > 
> > Maybe improve your Pinnacle stuff first, I can point you to a lot on the
> > TODO list.
> 
> Don't owe no Pinnacle any longer for years now.
> 
> I personally took part in flexcop development as well-informed people
> know.
> That's a good driver now, and Patrick is someone you can really work
> with, not unproblematic, but OK so far.
> He's no Abraham, and he's no Pitton....
>

http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-dvb@linuxtv.org/msg23780.html

There is not any progress with you and likely never will be.

Cheers,
Hermann
 


Topp oder Hopp? Tolle Figur, scharfes Dekolleté oder sehenswertes Tatoo?! Bewerten Sie die besten Bilder und zeigen Sie auch selbst, was Sie haben! Jetzt reinklicken und mitmachen: http://www.arcor.de/rd/footer.toh