From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: "David Härdeman" <david@hardeman.nu>
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, m.chehab@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] rc-core: remove generic scancode filter
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 23:01:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2637649.OvhTEs7Wbs@radagast> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140331193813.GC9610@hardeman.nu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --]
On Monday 31 March 2014 21:38:13 David Härdeman wrote:
> >The rest looks reasonable, though it could easily have been a separate
> >patch (at least as long as the show/store callbacks don't assume the
> >presence of the callbacks they use).
>
> Yes, I wanted to avoid there being more intermediary states than
> necessary (i.e. first a read/writable sysfs file, then one that can't be
> read/written, then the file disappears...).
Fair enough
> Can still respin it on top of your patch if you prefer.
It doesn't particularly bother me tbh, so do what you think is best.
Cheers
James
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-31 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-29 16:10 [PATCH 00/11] rc-core: My current patch queue David Härdeman
2014-03-29 16:10 ` [PATCH 01/11] bt8xx: fixup RC5 decoding David Härdeman
2014-03-29 16:10 ` [PATCH 02/11] rc-core: improve ir-kbd-i2c get_key functions David Härdeman
2014-03-29 16:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] rc-core: document the protocol type David Härdeman
2014-03-31 9:54 ` James Hogan
2014-03-31 19:39 ` David Härdeman
2014-03-29 16:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] rc-core: do not change 32bit NEC scancode format for now David Härdeman
2014-03-31 9:09 ` James Hogan
2014-03-29 16:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] rc-core: split dev->s_filter David Härdeman
2014-04-03 23:27 ` James Hogan
2014-03-29 16:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] rc-core: remove generic scancode filter David Härdeman
2014-03-31 9:29 ` James Hogan
2014-03-31 19:38 ` David Härdeman
2014-03-31 22:01 ` James Hogan [this message]
2014-03-29 16:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] dib0700: NEC scancode cleanup David Härdeman
2014-03-29 16:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] lmedm04: " David Härdeman
2014-03-29 16:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] saa7134: NEC scancode fix David Härdeman
2014-03-29 16:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] [RFC] rc-core: use the full 32 bits for NEC scancodes David Härdeman
2014-03-31 9:44 ` James Hogan
2014-03-31 10:19 ` David Härdeman
2014-03-31 10:56 ` James Hogan
2014-03-31 13:22 ` David Härdeman
2014-03-31 14:06 ` James Hogan
2014-03-31 15:26 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2014-03-31 16:47 ` David Härdeman
2014-03-31 12:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2014-03-31 12:58 ` David Härdeman
2014-03-31 13:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2014-03-31 13:54 ` David Härdeman
2014-03-29 16:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] [RFC] rc-core: don't throw away protocol information David Härdeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2637649.OvhTEs7Wbs@radagast \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=david@hardeman.nu \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox