From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>,
Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>,
Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] [media] media: omap_vout: Convert omap_vout_uservirt_to_phys() to use get_vaddr_pfns()
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 12:26:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <29269630.Rti2m5eC9a@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <557AA489.2010809@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3581 bytes --]
Hi Tomi,
On Friday 12 June 2015 12:21:13 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 11/06/15 07:21, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday 10 June 2015 06:20:45 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >> From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> >>
> >> Convert omap_vout_uservirt_to_phys() to use get_vaddr_pfns() instead of
> >> hand made mapping of virtual address to physical address. Also the
> >> function leaked page reference from get_user_pages() so fix that by
> >> properly release the reference when omap_vout_buffer_release() is
> >> called.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
> >> [hans.verkuil@cisco.com: remove unused struct omap_vout_device *vout
> >> variable]
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout.c
> >> b/drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout.c index
> >> f09c5f17a42f..7feb6394f111
> >> 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/omap/omap_vout.c
> >> @@ -195,46 +195,34 @@ static int omap_vout_try_format(struct
> >> v4l2_pix_format *pix) }
> >>
> >> /*
> >>
> >> - * omap_vout_uservirt_to_phys: This inline function is used to convert
> >> user - * space virtual address to physical address.
> >> + * omap_vout_get_userptr: Convert user space virtual address to physical
> >> + * address.
> >>
> >> */
> >>
> >> -static unsigned long omap_vout_uservirt_to_phys(unsigned long virtp)
> >> +static int omap_vout_get_userptr(struct videobuf_buffer *vb, u32 virtp,
> >> + u32 *physp)
> >>
> >> {
> >>
> >> - unsigned long physp = 0;
> >> - struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> >> - struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> >> + struct frame_vector *vec;
> >> + int ret;
> >>
> >> /* For kernel direct-mapped memory, take the easy way */
> >>
> >> - if (virtp >= PAGE_OFFSET)
> >> - return virt_to_phys((void *) virtp);
> >> -
> >> - down_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
> >> - vma = find_vma(mm, virtp);
> >> - if (vma && (vma->vm_flags & VM_IO) && vma->vm_pgoff) {
> >> - /* this will catch, kernel-allocated, mmaped-to-usermode
> >> - addresses */
> >> - physp = (vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT) + (virtp - vma->vm_start);
> >> - up_read(¤t->mm->mmap_sem);
> >> - } else {
> >> - /* otherwise, use get_user_pages() for general userland pages */
> >> - int res, nr_pages = 1;
> >> - struct page *pages;
> >> + if (virtp >= PAGE_OFFSET) {
> >> + *physp = virt_to_phys((void *)virtp);
> >
> > Lovely. virtp comes from userspace and as far as I know it arrives here
> > completely unchecked. The problem isn't introduced by this patch, but
> > omap_vout buffer management seems completely broken to me, and nobody
> > seems to care about the driver. Given that omapdrm should now provide the
> > video output capabilities that are missing from omapfb and resulted in
> > the development of omap_vout, shouldn't we drop the omap_vout driver ?
> >
> > Tomi, any opinion on this ? Do you see any omap_vout capability missing
> > from omapdrm ?
>
> I've never used omap_vout, so I don't even know what it offers. I do
> know it supports VRFB rotation (omap3), which we don't have on omapdrm,
> though. Whether anyone uses that (or omap_vout), I have no idea...
>
> I'd personally love to get rid of omap_vout, as it causes complications
> on omapfb/omapdss side.
How difficult would it be to implement VRFB rotation in omapdrm ?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-10 9:20 [PATCH 0/9] Helper to abstract vma handling in media layer Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-06-10 9:20 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: Provide new get_vaddr_frames() helper Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-06-11 8:01 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2015-06-10 9:20 ` [PATCH 2/9] [media] media: omap_vout: Convert omap_vout_uservirt_to_phys() to use get_vaddr_pfns() Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-06-11 4:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-06-11 17:23 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-06-12 9:21 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-06-12 9:26 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2015-06-12 9:44 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2015-06-10 9:20 ` [PATCH 3/9] [media] vb2: Provide helpers for mapping virtual addresses Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-06-10 9:20 ` [PATCH 4/9] [media] media: vb2: Convert vb2_dma_sg_get_userptr() to use frame vector Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-06-10 9:20 ` [PATCH 5/9] [media] media: vb2: Convert vb2_vmalloc_get_userptr() " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-06-10 9:20 ` [PATCH 6/9] [media] media: vb2: Convert vb2_dc_get_userptr() " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-06-10 9:20 ` [PATCH 7/9] [media] media: vb2: Remove unused functions Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-06-10 9:20 ` [PATCH 8/9] [media] drm/exynos: Convert g2d_userptr_get_dma_addr() to use get_vaddr_frames() Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-06-10 9:20 ` [PATCH 9/9] [media] mm: Move get_vaddr_frames() behind a config option Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2015-06-10 16:37 ` Josh Triplett
2015-06-18 13:44 ` Jan Kara
2015-06-11 9:08 ` [PATCH 0/9] Helper to abstract vma handling in media layer Hans Verkuil
2015-06-11 18:54 ` Andrew Morton
2015-06-11 19:51 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-06-15 7:41 ` Hans Verkuil
2015-06-22 22:04 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=29269630.Rti2m5eC9a@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fabf@skynet.be \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox