From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from perceval.ideasonboard.com ([95.142.166.194]:49173 "EHLO perceval.ideasonboard.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755404Ab2KAQEV (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:04:21 -0400 From: Laurent Pinchart To: media-workshop@linuxtv.org Cc: Hans Verkuil , Guennadi Liakhovetski , linux-media Subject: Re: [media-workshop] Tentative Agenda for the November workshop Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 17:05:12 +0100 Message-ID: <31457466.htZuxY1j9H@avalon> In-Reply-To: <201211011701.02482.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> References: <201210221035.56897.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <201211011701.02482.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 01 November 2012 17:01:02 Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Wed October 31 2012 14:12:05 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > This is the tentative agenda for the media workshop on November 8, > > > > 2012. If you have additional things that you want to discuss, or > > > > something is wrong or incomplete in this list, please let me know so I > > > > can update the list. > > > > > > > > - Explain current merging process (Mauro) > > > > - Open floor for discussions on how to improve it (Mauro) > > > > - Write down minimum requirements for new V4L2 (and DVB?) drivers, > > > > both for staging and mainline acceptance: which frameworks to use, > > > > v4l2-compliance, etc. (Hans Verkuil) > > > > > > > > - V4L2 ambiguities (Hans Verkuil) > > > > - TSMux device (a mux rather than a demux): Alain Volmat > > > > - dmabuf status, esp. with regards to being able to test > > > > (Mauro/Samsung) > > > > - Device tree support (Guennadi, not known yet whether this topic is > > > > needed) > > > > > > + asynchronous probing, I guess. It's probably implicitly included > > > though. > > > > As the meeting approaches, it would be good to have a decision - do we > > want to discuss DT / async or not? My flights this time are not quite long > > enough to prepare for the discussion on them;-) > > Looking at the current discussions I think discussing possible async > solutions would be very useful. The DT implementation itself seems to be > OK, at least I haven't seen any big discussions regarding that. Agreed. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart