Re: drivers without explicit MAINTAINERS entry - was: Re: [media-workshop] Tentative Agenda for the November workshop

[Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>]

Hi Martin,

On Monday 10 December 2012 23:01:31 martin@neutronstar.dyndns.org wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:53:17AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> 
> > On Thursday 08 November 2012 15:18:38 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> [ snip ]
> 
> > > These are 'Maintained' by me:
> > > 
> > > i2c/aptina-pll.ko              = i2c/aptina-pll.c
> > > i2c/mt9p031.ko                 = i2c/mt9p031.c
> > > i2c/mt9t001.ko                 = i2c/mt9t001.c
> > > i2c/mt9v032.ko                 = i2c/mt9v032.c
> > > 
> > > I can maintain the following driver if needed:
> > > 
> > > i2c/mt9m032.ko                 = i2c/mt9m032.c
> > 
> > Do you plan to send a MAINTAINERS patch for this driver (and thus maintain
> > the driver :-)), or should I maintain it ?
> 
> I sadly neigher have time nor hardware to maintain this driver at the moment
> so i would be more than happy if you can maintain it.

OK, I will do that.

> > > I could also take over maintenance the following driver, but I don't
> > > have
> > > access to a hardware platform that uses it:
> > > 
> > > i2c/mt9v011.ko                 = i2c/mt9v011.c
> > > 
> > > These are, as far as I know, co-maintained by Sakari and me :-)
> > > 
> > > i2c/adp1653.ko                 = i2c/adp1653.c
> > > i2c/as3645a.ko                 = i2c/as3645a.c

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart