From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/15] v4l: vsp1: Move DRM pipeline output setup code to a function
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 15:35:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3938270.yYcQyIxAEm@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <daa6e220-0e20-d8cc-717a-dc9083ca8baf@ideasonboard.com>
Hi Kieran,
On Thursday, 29 March 2018 14:49:12 EEST Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> Thank you for another patch :D
You're welcome, there will be more ;-)
> On 26/02/18 21:45, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > In order to make the vsp1_du_setup_lif() easier to read, and for
> > symmetry with the DRM pipeline input setup, move the pipeline output
> > setup code to a separate function.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
>
> Just an easy code move. And I agree it improves things.
>
> Small question below, but otherwise:
>
> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c | 107 ++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c index 00ce99bd1605..1c8adda47440
> > 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c
> > @@ -276,6 +276,66 @@ static int vsp1_du_pipeline_setup_input(struct
> > vsp1_device *vsp1,
> > return 0;
> >
> > }
> >
> > +/* Setup the output side of the pipeline (WPF and LIF). */
> > +static int vsp1_du_pipeline_setup_output(struct vsp1_device *vsp1,
> > + struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe)
> > +{
> > + struct vsp1_drm_pipeline *drm_pipe = to_vsp1_drm_pipeline(pipe);
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_format format = {
> > + .which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE,
>
> Why do you initialise this .which here, but all the other member variables
> below.
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to group all of this initialisation together? or
> is there a distinction in keeping the .which separate.
>
> (Perhaps this is just a way to initialise the rest of the structure to 0,
> without using the memset?)
The initialization of the .which field is indeed there to avoid the memset,
but other than that there's no particular reason. I find it clearer to keep
the initialization of the structure close to the code that makes use of it
(the next v4l2_subdev_call in this case).
As initializing all members when declaring the variable doesn't make a change
in code size (gcc 6.4.0) but increases .rodata by 18 bytes and decreases
__modver by the same amount, I'm tempted to leave it as-is unless you think it
should be changed.
> > + };
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + format.pad = RWPF_PAD_SINK;
> > + format.format.width = drm_pipe->width;
> > + format.format.height = drm_pipe->height;
> > + format.format.code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_ARGB8888_1X32;
> > + format.format.field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> > +
> > + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(&pipe->output->entity.subdev, pad, set_fmt,
NULL,
> > + &format);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "%s: set format %ux%u (%x) on WPF%u sink\n",
> > + __func__, format.format.width, format.format.height,
> > + format.format.code, pipe->output->entity.index);
> > +
> > + format.pad = RWPF_PAD_SOURCE;
> > + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(&pipe->output->entity.subdev, pad, get_fmt,
NULL,
> > + &format);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "%s: got format %ux%u (%x) on WPF%u source\n",
> > + __func__, format.format.width, format.format.height,
> > + format.format.code, pipe->output->entity.index);
> > +
> > + format.pad = LIF_PAD_SINK;
> > + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(&pipe->lif->subdev, pad, set_fmt, NULL,
> > + &format);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "%s: set format %ux%u (%x) on LIF%u sink\n",
> > + __func__, format.format.width, format.format.height,
> > + format.format.code, pipe->lif->index);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Verify that the format at the output of the pipeline matches the
> > + * requested frame size and media bus code.
> > + */
> > + if (format.format.width != drm_pipe->width ||
> > + format.format.height != drm_pipe->height ||
> > + format.format.code != MEDIA_BUS_FMT_ARGB8888_1X32) {
> > + dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "%s: format mismatch on LIF%u\n", __func__,
> > + pipe->lif->index);
> > + return -EPIPE;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >
> > /* Configure all entities in the pipeline. */
> > static void vsp1_du_pipeline_configure(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe)
> > {
> >
> > @@ -356,7 +416,6 @@ int vsp1_du_setup_lif(struct device *dev, unsigned int
> > pipe_index,>
> > struct vsp1_drm_pipeline *drm_pipe;
> > struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe;
> > struct vsp1_bru *bru;
> >
> > - struct v4l2_subdev_format format;
> >
> > unsigned long flags;
> > unsigned int i;
> > int ret;
> >
> > @@ -417,54 +476,10 @@ int vsp1_du_setup_lif(struct device *dev, unsigned
> > int pipe_index,>
> > if (ret < 0)
> >
> > return ret;
> >
> > - memset(&format, 0, sizeof(format));
> > - format.which = V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE;
> > - format.pad = RWPF_PAD_SINK;
> > - format.format.width = cfg->width;
> > - format.format.height = cfg->height;
> > - format.format.code = MEDIA_BUS_FMT_ARGB8888_1X32;
> > - format.format.field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> > -
> > - ret = v4l2_subdev_call(&pipe->output->entity.subdev, pad, set_fmt,
NULL,
> > - &format);
> > + ret = vsp1_du_pipeline_setup_output(vsp1, pipe);
> >
> > if (ret < 0)
> >
> > return ret;
> >
> > - dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "%s: set format %ux%u (%x) on WPF%u sink\n",
> > - __func__, format.format.width, format.format.height,
> > - format.format.code, pipe->output->entity.index);
> > -
> > - format.pad = RWPF_PAD_SOURCE;
> > - ret = v4l2_subdev_call(&pipe->output->entity.subdev, pad, get_fmt,
NULL,
> > - &format);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > -
> > - dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "%s: got format %ux%u (%x) on WPF%u source\n",
> > - __func__, format.format.width, format.format.height,
> > - format.format.code, pipe->output->entity.index);
> > -
> > - format.pad = LIF_PAD_SINK;
> > - ret = v4l2_subdev_call(&pipe->lif->subdev, pad, set_fmt, NULL,
> > - &format);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > -
> > - dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "%s: set format %ux%u (%x) on LIF%u sink\n",
> > - __func__, format.format.width, format.format.height,
> > - format.format.code, pipe_index);
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Verify that the format at the output of the pipeline matches the
> > - * requested frame size and media bus code.
> > - */
> > - if (format.format.width != cfg->width ||
> > - format.format.height != cfg->height ||
> > - format.format.code != MEDIA_BUS_FMT_ARGB8888_1X32) {
> > - dev_dbg(vsp1->dev, "%s: format mismatch\n", __func__);
> > - return -EPIPE;
> > - }
> > -
> >
> > /* Enable the VSP1. */
> > ret = vsp1_device_get(vsp1);
> > if (ret < 0)
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-02 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-26 21:45 [PATCH 00/15] R-Car VSP1: Dynamically assign blend units to display pipelines Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 01/15] v4l: vsp1: Don't start/stop media pipeline for DRM Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-04 15:35 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 02/15] v4l: vsp1: Remove outdated comment Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-27 8:22 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2018-02-27 9:14 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 12:27 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-03-28 19:04 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-03-29 6:51 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 03/15] v4l: vsp1: Remove unused field from vsp1_drm_pipeline structure Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 12:31 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 04/15] v4l: vsp1: Store pipeline pointer in vsp1_entity Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 13:46 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 05/15] v4l: vsp1: Use vsp1_entity.pipe to check if entity belongs to a pipeline Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 14:10 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-03-29 7:00 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 06/15] v4l: vsp1: Share duplicated DRM pipeline configuration code Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 14:25 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 07/15] v4l: vsp1: Move DRM atomic commit pipeline setup to separate function Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 14:43 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-03-29 7:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 08/15] v4l: vsp1: Setup BRU at atomic commit time Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 19:01 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 09/15] v4l: vsp1: Replace manual DRM pipeline input setup in vsp1_du_setup_lif Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 15:01 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 10/15] v4l: vsp1: Move DRM pipeline output setup code to a function Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-29 11:49 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-04-02 12:35 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2018-04-04 16:15 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-04-04 21:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 11/15] v4l: vsp1: Add per-display list completion notification support Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-04 16:16 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-04-04 21:43 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-05 8:46 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 12/15] v4l: vsp1: Generalize detection of entity removal from DRM pipeline Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-29 11:37 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-04-02 12:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 13/15] v4l: vsp1: Assign BRU and BRS to pipelines dynamically Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-04 16:00 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-04-04 21:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 14/15] v4l: vsp1: Add BRx dynamic assignment debugging messages Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-04 16:17 ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 15/15] v4l: vsp1: Rename BRU to BRx Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-04 16:23 ` Kieran Bingham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3938270.yYcQyIxAEm@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox