From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:63499 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751028AbcLLSDh (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:03:37 -0500 Subject: Re: Clarification for acceptance statistics? To: Daniele Nicolodi References: <5560ffc2-e17d-5750-24e5-3150aba5d8aa@grinta.net> <581046dd-0a4a-acea-a6a8-8d2469594881@grinta.net> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Khoroshilov , Hans Verkuil , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org From: SF Markus Elfring Message-ID: <3d09590c-9a10-f756-1b71-536ea37d8524@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 19:03:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <581046dd-0a4a-acea-a6a8-8d2469594881@grinta.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Have you proposed a similar patch that was accepted? Yes. - It happened a few times. > I don't find record of it, but I may be wrong. It is really needed to clarify the corresponding software development history any further? Regards, Markus