From: "Devin Heitmueller" <devin.heitmueller@gmail.com>
To: "Steven Toth" <stoth@linuxtv.org>
Cc: Linux-dvb <linux-dvb@linuxtv.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Revisiting the SNR/Strength issue
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 10:40:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <412bdbff0810150740h61049f5fvb679bdebbcd4084d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48F5FE80.5010106@linuxtv.org>
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Steven Toth <stoth@linuxtv.org> wrote:
> The SNR units should be standardized into a single metric, something
> actually useful like ESNO or db. If that isn't available then we should aim
> to eyeball / manually calibrate impossible boards against known reliable
> demods on the same feed, it should be close enough.
>
> This requires patience and time from the right people with the right
> hardware.
I agree that standardizing on a particular unit would be the ideal
scenario. Realistically though, do you have any confidence that this
would actually happen? Many frontends would have to change, reverse
engineering would have to be done, and in many cases without a signal
generator this would be very difficult. This could take months or
years, or might never happen.
Certainly I'm in favor of expressing that there is a preferred unit
that new frontends should use (whether that be ESNO or db), but the
solution I'm suggesting would allow the field to become useful *now*.
This would hold us over until all the other frontends are converted to
db (which I have doubts will ever actually happen).
Devin
--
Devin J. Heitmueller
http://www.devinheitmueller.com
AIM: devinheitmueller
_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-15 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-15 14:24 [linux-dvb] Revisiting the SNR/Strength issue Devin Heitmueller
2008-10-15 14:30 ` Steven Toth
2008-10-15 14:40 ` Devin Heitmueller [this message]
2008-10-15 18:18 ` Steven Toth
2008-10-16 14:28 ` Devin Heitmueller
2008-10-17 9:40 ` Christophe Thommeret
2008-10-17 9:55 ` Andreas Oberritter
2008-10-17 13:31 ` Steven Toth
2008-10-17 14:12 ` Andreas Oberritter
2008-10-17 18:23 ` Steven Toth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=412bdbff0810150740h61049f5fvb679bdebbcd4084d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=devin.heitmueller@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-dvb@linuxtv.org \
--cc=stoth@linuxtv.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox