From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m54MYAAL006181 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:34:10 -0400 Received: from web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.141]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m54MXoTs027125 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:33:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 15:33:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Sam Logen To: Daniel Gimpelevich In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <43192.2143.qm@web35602.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Question - Component input via software card List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: --- Daniel Gimpelevich wrote: > Sam Logen yahoo.com> writes: > > > Would it be possible to connect component cables > from > > a high def. video source to the video and audio > > composite plugs of the capture card, and have a > > program process the three streams together as > video > > streams instead of video and audio streams, then > save > > the result in a file? > > That would not be possible with any off-the-shelf > composite capture card, but it > would be possible to design your own capture > hardware that could use the same > plugs for either audio or component video. Just > getting a Hauppauge HD-PVR would > likely be cheaper. I hadn't heard of that. I haven't been paying attention to latest hardware releases. But can you explan why my suggestion wouldn't be possible? I've no doubt you're right, I'd just like to hear why. That HD-PVR looks the way to go, but adding that thing looks like it will up my cabinet temp by 20 degrees. Sam -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list