From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
Songjun Wu <songjun.wu@microchip.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/7] ov7670: add devicetree support
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:39:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4483871.dyhER8N5Lv@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160921113328.GD18295@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
Hello Sakari,
On Wednesday 21 Sep 2016 14:33:29 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 03:44:00PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > + assigned-clock-rates = <24000000>;
> >
> > You should compute and set the clock rate dynamically in the driver, not
> > hardcode it in DT.
>
> This frequency is typically defined by hardware engineers and it's
> hand-picked from possible ranges. What counts is EMC so you don't disturb
> a GSM/3G/4G modem (if you have one) or GPS receiver, for instance. In order
> to freely choose this frequency, you'd also need to be aware of the limits
> of the sensor's internal clock tree, and make sure you still would be able
> to obtain the desired frame rates for there are often corner cases where the
> resulting maximum pixel clock may be substantially lower if your input
> frequency goes up.
>
> I also haven't encountered a use case for more than a single, fixed
> frequency. In other words I'd keep this constant.
My review predates our recent discussion on this topic. I still believe that
in the general case we could want to express allowable frequencies constraints
in DT and let the driver compute the desired frequency based on timings.
However, I also agree that there are very few cases for this, so it's not
really worth tackling the issue at the moment. I'm thus fine with the usage of
assigned-clock-rates.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-21 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-17 6:29 [RFC PATCH 0/7] atmel-isi: convert to a standalone driver Hans Verkuil
2016-08-17 6:29 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] ov7670: add media controller support Hans Verkuil
2016-08-17 12:25 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-08-17 6:29 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] ov7670: call v4l2_async_register_subdev Hans Verkuil
2016-08-17 12:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-08-17 6:29 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] ov7670: fix g/s_parm Hans Verkuil
2016-08-17 6:29 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] ov7670: get xvclk Hans Verkuil
2016-08-17 12:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-09-21 11:18 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-08-17 6:29 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] ov7670: add devicetree support Hans Verkuil
2016-08-17 12:44 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-08-26 7:45 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-09-21 13:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-09-21 11:33 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-09-21 12:39 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2016-09-21 11:09 ` Sakari Ailus
2016-08-17 6:29 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] atmel-isi: remove dependency of the soc-camera framework Hans Verkuil
2016-08-18 5:53 ` Wu, Songjun
2016-09-21 7:04 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-09-23 6:05 ` Wu, Songjun
2016-10-18 9:21 ` Wu, Songjun
2016-10-18 10:58 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-10-19 7:36 ` Wu, Songjun
2016-10-19 7:46 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-10-19 7:48 ` Wu, Songjun
2016-11-14 8:19 ` Hans Verkuil
2016-11-14 8:22 ` Wu, Songjun
2016-08-17 6:29 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] sama5d3 dts: enable atmel-isi Hans Verkuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4483871.dyhER8N5Lv@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
--cc=songjun.wu@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).