From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail.work.de ([212.12.32.20]) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JTlWL-0001ft-0l for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: <47C33CB1.1080502@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 02:09:53 +0400 From: Manu Abraham MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vangelis Nonas References: <32245669.2613.1203594791803.JavaMail.tomcat@dali.otenet.gr> <47C01325.10407@otenet.gr> <20080223174406.GB30387@moelleritberatung.de> <47C0803D.2020504@gmail.com> <20080223212013.GD30387@moelleritberatung.de> <47C0903B.70606@gmail.com> <20080223213258.GE30387@moelleritberatung.de> <20080223214718.GF30387@moelleritberatung.de> <47C09519.2090904@gmail.com> <47C09BCC.50403@gmail.com> <47C0CADE.6040203@otenet.gr> <47C0B1F9.1000609@gmail.com> <47C1764C.5070103@otenet.gr> <47C1AFC1.7050704@otenet.gr> <47C19735.4030601@gmail.com> <47C1D52B.6070906@otenet.gr> <47C1C55F.5030406@gmail.com> <47C32947.1030604@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <47C32947.1030604@otenet.gr> Cc: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] TechniSat SkyStar HD: Problems scaning and zaping List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: Vangelis Nonas wrote: > Hello, > > I have tested again changesets 7201 and 7205 with verbose 5, 2 and 1 > scanning 101 transponders on Hotbird (I attach my transponders file -- > it is taken and adopted from ProgDvb). > > Here are my statistics: > > Changeset Verbose channels > -------------------------------- > 7201 1 2152 > 7201 2 2105 > 7201 5 2081 > 7205 1 1760 > 7205 2 1608 > 7205 5 1578 Are you "really" sure that 7201 behaves better than others. I ask this, since there was a bug in 7201 which caused many people not to have a LOCK, the bugs which was fixed in 7203 and 7204. I am at a loss now, as to understanding this strange phenomena, how a lock was achieved with no communication to the tuner. If it were 7200, i could have still believed, there was a possibility, but 7201 i am terribly confused. Can you please verify whether you didn't get mixed up with the changeset numbers or the logs that were produced ? Regards, Manu _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb