From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr ([195.170.0.93] ident=OTEnet-mail-system) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JU7Gx-00025f-He for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2008 22:23:35 +0100 Message-ID: <47C49F79.1080704@otenet.gr> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:23:37 +0000 From: Vangelis Nonas MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manu Abraham References: <32245669.2613.1203594791803.JavaMail.tomcat@dali.otenet.gr> <47C01325.10407@otenet.gr> <20080223174406.GB30387@moelleritberatung.de> <47C0803D.2020504@gmail.com> <20080223212013.GD30387@moelleritberatung.de> <47C0903B.70606@gmail.com> <20080223213258.GE30387@moelleritberatung.de> <20080223214718.GF30387@moelleritberatung.de> <47C09519.2090904@gmail.com> <47C09BCC.50403@gmail.com> <47C0CADE.6040203@otenet.gr> <47C0B1F9.1000609@gmail.com> <47C1764C.5070103@otenet.gr> <47C1AFC1.7050704@otenet.gr> <47C19735.4030601@gmail.com> <47C1D52B.6070906@otenet.gr> <47C1C55F.5030406@gmail.com> <47C32947.1030604@otenet.gr> <47C33CB1.1080502@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47C33CB1.1080502@gmail.com> Cc: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] TechniSat SkyStar HD: Problems scaning and zaping List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: Hello, Here is the output of hg log|head -n 5 for two different directories (multiproto and multiproto_7200) for multiproto: changeset: 7205:9bdb997e38b5 tag: tip user: Manu Abraham date: Sun Feb 24 02:10:56 2008 +0400 summary: We can now reduce the debug levels, just need to look at errors only. for multiproto_7200: changeset: 7200:45eec532cefa tag: tip parent: 7095:a577a5dbc93d parent: 7199:0448e5a6d8a6 user: Manu Abraham So I guess I was referring to 7200 and not to 7201. I am very positive about the results because I have tested it many times. It is just that it is 7200 instead of 7201. So as a concluesion, 7200 behaves better than 7205. My corrected little table follows below just for clarification. Changeset Verbose channels -------------------------------- 7200 1 2152 7200 2 2105 7200 5 2081 7205 1 1760 7205 2 1608 7205 5 1578 I apologise for the confusion, I may have caused. Regards Vagelis Manu Abraham wrote: > Vangelis Nonas wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have tested again changesets 7201 and 7205 with verbose 5, 2 and 1 >> scanning 101 transponders on Hotbird (I attach my transponders file >> -- it is taken and adopted from ProgDvb). >> >> Here are my statistics: >> >> Changeset Verbose channels >> -------------------------------- >> 7201 1 2152 >> 7201 2 2105 >> 7201 5 2081 >> 7205 1 1760 >> 7205 2 1608 >> 7205 5 1578 > > > Are you "really" sure that 7201 behaves better than others. I ask > this, since > there was a bug in 7201 which caused many people not to have a LOCK, the > bugs which was fixed in 7203 and 7204. I am at a loss now, as to > understanding this strange phenomena, how a lock was achieved with no > communication to the tuner. > > If it were 7200, i could have still believed, there was a possibility, > but 7201 > i am terribly confused. > > Can you please verify whether you didn't get mixed up with the changeset > numbers or the logs that were produced ? > > > Regards, > Manu > > > . > _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb