* Another very basic question...
@ 2008-03-14 16:32 r bartlett
2008-03-14 16:43 ` Markus Rechberger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: r bartlett @ 2008-03-14 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: video4linux-list
I'm happily watching the several QAM channels available on my line...but can I also watch the 80 some channels that my television gets? Is that "NTSC_M"?
Right now, if I turn on the TV I can get History, Food, Cartoon Network, etc...but on the computer it's only the basic networks and PBS.
Am I still doing something wrong?
---------------------------------
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Another very basic question...
2008-03-14 16:32 r bartlett
@ 2008-03-14 16:43 ` Markus Rechberger
2008-03-14 20:18 ` r bartlett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Markus Rechberger @ 2008-03-14 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: r bartlett; +Cc: video4linux-list
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:32 PM, r bartlett <techwritebos@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm happily watching the several QAM channels available on my line...but can I also watch the 80 some channels that my television gets? Is that "NTSC_M"?
>
> Right now, if I turn on the TV I can get History, Food, Cartoon Network, etc...but on the computer it's only the basic networks and PBS.
>
> Am I still doing something wrong?
>
>
the question is moreover what device do you have in your computer?
Also another question is are those NTSC-M Channels analogue signals
(so is it possible to connect your cable directly to an old
television, or do you have a receiver in between).
There are hybrid ATSC/QAM devices available which can also handle NTSC-M.
Markus
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Another very basic question...
2008-03-14 16:43 ` Markus Rechberger
@ 2008-03-14 20:18 ` r bartlett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: r bartlett @ 2008-03-14 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Markus Rechberger, video4linux-list
I've got a WinTV-HVR-1800, which has an analog tuner and a ATSC/QAM tuner. The analog side seems to not yet be supported (It works -- I can boot to Vista and watch the analog side) by Linux, but I was wondering whether I can tweak my channels.conf or something and get more digital channels.
I'm kind of new to the various ATSC, QAM, NTSC_M stuff. My assumption up to this point has been that if I want to watch the full range of channels (1-120) or something, I need to do it through analog.
My system is Comcast Digital cable with OnDemand, a Comcast-supplied box (looks small, like a router, not a PVR) and remote control (neither of which I'm currently using), and a Y-split cable line that goes directly to my tv card. Currently I'm seeing things like NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS (a few channels), FOX, CW...and a few local stations. If it's also possible to tune to Food Network, Sci-fi, Cartoon Network, etc, that would be great. These stations come in fine on my regular television with no box or anything -- just the cable line going into the house. I'm guessing that if more channels were _going_ to come in at all on my tuner card, they'd already be coming in. :-) But I could be wrong.
>From reading other posts and following a few other forums, it looks like the analog part is still not supported by the 2.6.24 kernel. But if these other channels are available on the digital side, that'd be cool. My tuning, thus far, has only been on QAM256. ATSC (antenna, right?) didn't come in at all. I haven't tried HRC or the others. Just us-Cable-Standard-center-frequencies-QAM256, which found about 350 signals, of which only about 10 were actual working channels.
Is it possible to have more channels come in? Should I plug in my Comcast box and use a different method to scan for channels? (I've tried plugging in the box but that seems to kill my digital signal entirely -- I then don't get any channels)
Thanks for putting up with these really basic questions. I apologize in advance...and greatly appreciate the help!
Markus Rechberger <mrechberger@gmail.com> wrote: On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 5:32 PM, r bartlett wrote:
> I'm happily watching the several QAM channels available on my line...but can I also watch the 80 some channels that my television gets? Is that "NTSC_M"?
>
> Right now, if I turn on the TV I can get History, Food, Cartoon Network, etc...but on the computer it's only the basic networks and PBS.
>
> Am I still doing something wrong?
>
>
the question is moreover what device do you have in your computer?
Also another question is are those NTSC-M Channels analogue signals
(so is it possible to connect your cable directly to an old
television, or do you have a receiver in between).
There are hybrid ATSC/QAM devices available which can also handle NTSC-M.
Markus
---------------------------------
Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Another very basic question...
@ 2008-03-15 22:40 CityK
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: CityK @ 2008-03-15 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux and Kernel Video
I'm going to be blunt about something -- you're not being particularly
helpful to yourself or the list:
- To yourself because you're not being very efficient.
- To the list because you're breeching etiquette.
Here are a few tips:
1 - instead of breaking threading, and opposed to having a zillion
different threads essentially all about the same things, keep your
content within one i.e. the original message ... having a contiguous
thread will also help those who may, in future, search the lists for
similar problems
2 - entitle your threads appropriately -- i.e. "another very basic
question ... " or "the final inch" are not very helpful .... the last
one in particular, given the thousand or so emails I receive each week
from China, Russia etc etc regarding viagra, penis enlargement etc etc
etc ... if your goal is to get/reach those who are most capable of
helping you, you're certainly going about it the wrong way ... (i) busy
people will browse over items that don't seem interesting or appear on
the surface to possibly be spam and (ii) please don't ambiguious
messages as it just ends up wasting others time in trying to figure out
what your question is/relates too (i.e. perfect example: Merc trying to
figure out what you were talking about in this thread)
3 - a number of the "basic questions" you have posed are readily
answered in the wikis ... so, in posting here about these elementary
issues, you've wasted your and my (and others) time too ...
- your time because you likely could have read about the solutions
quicker then you typed/enquired about them
- my and others time because we've already spent considerable time
trying to document such elementary questions in the wiki ... and my time
again in having to compose this message to draw light to this fact
4 - please don't top post
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Another very basic question...
@ 2008-03-15 23:17 CityK
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: CityK @ 2008-03-15 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux and Kernel Video
>
> I've got a WinTV-HVR-1800, which has an analog tuner and a ATSC/QAM tuner. The \
> analog side seems to not yet be supported (It works -- I can boot to Vista and watch \
> the analog side) by Linux,
>
> ...
>
> > From reading other posts and following a few other forums, it looks like the analog \
> > part is still not supported by the 2.6.24 kernel.
>
That's correct, analog is currently not supported under Linux ... except
for preliminary/experimental support available in one of stoth's Hg repos
> but I was wondering whether I can tweak my channels.conf \
> or something and get more digital channels.
>
> I'm kind of new to the various ATSC, QAM, NTSC_M stuff. My assumption up to this \
> point has been that if I want to watch the full range of channels (1-120) or \
> something, I need to do it through analog.
>
> My system is Comcast Digital cable with OnDemand, a Comcast-supplied box (looks \
> small, like a router, not a PVR) and remote control (neither of which I'm currently \
> using), and a Y-split cable line that goes directly to my tv card. Currently I'm \
> seeing things like NBC, CBS, ABC, PBS (a few channels), FOX, CW...and a few local \
> stations. If it's also possible to tune to Food Network, Sci-fi, Cartoon Network, \
> etc, that would be great. These stations come in fine on my regular television with \
> no box or anything -- just the cable line going into the house. I'm guessing that if \
> more channels were _going_ to come in at all on my tuner card, they'd already be \
> coming in. :-) But I could be wrong.
>
> ....
>
> > But if these other channels are \
> > available on the digital side, that'd be cool. My tuning, thus far, has only been \
> > on QAM256.
>
>
The Food network etc channels you are seeing on your tv (cable straight
from wall to tv) are analog channels. As your tv card currently doesn't
support analog, these won't work. If your cable co. transmits
unencrypted digital versions of those channels, your card would work.
Doesn't sound like that is the case for you....In other words, there are
no "tweaks" for your channels.conf file that are going to acquire those
channels.
> ATSC (antenna, right?) didn't come in at all.
Yes, ATSC is digital over/off-the-air and requires an antenna for
reception .... it uses 8VSB modulation.
Digital cable in North America (which isn't ATSC, but is highly
conformative and interoperative with ATSC, and where the remaining
differences being defined by SCTE etc standards) typically/by defacto
uses QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation).
> I haven't tried HRC or \
> > the others. Just us-Cable-Standard-center-frequencies-QAM256, which found about 350 \
> > signals, of which only about 10 were actual working channels.
>
Certainly sounds like your cable operator/supplier uses centre frequencies
> Is it possible to have more channels come in?
Only if they are unencrypted.
> Should plug in my Comcast box and \
> use a different method to scan for channels? (I've tried plugging in the box but \
> that seems to kill my digital signal entirely -- I then don't get any channels)
>
Doesn't work that way. Can't remember if I wrote about it in the wiki
or not, but I do have a bookmark handy; See:
http://archive2.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=7328646&&#post7328646
The post is a bit dated now, and in reference to something else, but it
should contain an explanation regarding why
STB_RF_output--to--digital_tuner_card_RF_input doesn't work.
> Thanks for putting up with these really basic questions. I apologize in \
> advance...and greatly appreciate the help!
NP -- but please do heed the advice in the previous message.
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-15 23:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-15 22:40 Another very basic question CityK
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-15 23:17 CityK
2008-03-14 16:32 r bartlett
2008-03-14 16:43 ` Markus Rechberger
2008-03-14 20:18 ` r bartlett
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox