From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.de ([194.25.134.82]) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JcRnp-0001Z9-V2 for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:55:58 +0100 Message-ID: <47E2CF49.8070302@t-online.de> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:55:37 +0100 From: Hartmut Hackmann MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ldvb@ns.bog.msu.ru References: <200803200118.26462@orion.escape-edv.de> In-Reply-To: Cc: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] TDA10086 fails? DiSEqC bad? TT S-1401 Horizontal transponder fails List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: Hi, ldvb@ns.bog.msu.ru schrieb: > On Thu, 20 Mar 2008, Oliver Endriss wrote: > >> Sorry, if you want to have your problem fixed, you have dig through the >> register programming of the frontend driver. Use an i2c sniffer and >> compare the register settings of the the windows driver with those of >> the linux driver... >> If you want to experiment with some parameters, you might have a look at >> changeset >> http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/8a19aa788239 >> Maybe you can find a better register setting which fixes your problem. > > Increased baseband cut-off helps! (tda826*.c) > so, making it > buf[6] = 0xfe; > solves the problem. > Maybe, I'll check other values. > This might be right! I could not get good information regarding the transponder bandwidths. We might need to make this depend on the symbol rate or a module parameter. Can we grind this out after easter? Best regards Hartmut _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb