From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m344EuqO028552 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:14:56 -0400 Received: from mail.hauppauge.com (mail.hauppauge.com [167.206.143.4]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m344EhK7001346 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 00:14:43 -0400 Message-ID: <47F5AB2A.3020908@linuxtv.org> Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:14:34 -0400 From: Michael Krufky MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Endriss References: <1115343012.20080318233620@a-j.ru> <1207269838.3365.4.camel@pc08.localdom.local> <20080403222937.3b234a40@gaivota> <200804040456.57561@orion.escape-edv.de> In-Reply-To: <200804040456.57561@orion.escape-edv.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] TT S-1401 problem with kernel 2.6.24 ??? List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Oliver Endriss wrote: > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >>>>> If we should go back to 2.6.23 level, so far nobody seems to have >>>>> realized a improvement for the LifeView Trio stuff, I'm not against it. >>>>> >>>>> The changeset in question to revert is mercurial 6579. >>>>> >>>>> If nobody else is interested and no comments, I also don't care anymore. >>>>> >>>> (Basically I don't care because I am tired of discussing kernel >>>> politics.) >>>> >>>> Imho a fix should be applied, no matter how many lines it has. >>>> If that is not possible the offending patch should be reverted in >>>> 2.6.24.x. >>>> >> ... >> >> Let me try to reset to a sane state. >> >> With the current tree (changesets 6579 and 7186), is there any broken board? If >> so, what board(s)? >> >> Both patches are already applied at mainstream and should be available on >> 2.6.25. Are those OK for 2.6.25? >> >> Is there any missing patch that should be sent to -stable (2.6.24)? If so, what >> patch? >> > > The point is that 6579 was applied to 2.6.24.x, but 7186 wasn't. > So TTS_1401 support is broken for the 2.6.24 series. > > Imho 7186 _must_ be applied to 2.6.24, no matter how large the patch is. > Are you saying that THIS is the patch that needs to be applied to 2.6.24.y ? http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/eb6bc7f18024 If so, this patch seems fine for -stable. We just have to make sure it applies correctly, etc. -Mike -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list