From: Gert Vervoort <gert.vervoort@hccnet.nl>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com, Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org>
Subject: Re: Hauppauge WinTV regreession from 2.6.24 to 2.6.25
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:02:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48120EA0.4020704@hccnet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48120D15.3010109@hccnet.nl>
Gert Vervoort wrote:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:40:14 -0400
>> "Michael Krufky" <mkrufky@linuxtv.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:56 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>>> <mchehab@infradead.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 05:55:28 +0200
>>>> hermann pitton <hermann-pitton@arcor.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > > > >>>> I am testing a kernel upgrade from 2.6.24.to 2.6.25,
>>>> and the drivers
>>>> > > > >>>> for the Hauppauge WinTV appear to have suffered some
>>>> regression
>>>> > > > >>>> between the two kernel versions.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> do you see the auto detection issue?
>>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > Either tell it is just nothing, what I very seriously doubt, or
>>>> please
>>>> > comment.
>>>> >
>>>> > I don't like to end up on LKML again getting told that written
>>>> rules
>>>> > don't exist ;)
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for now answer earlier. Too busy here, due to the merge window.
>>>>
>>>> This seems to be an old bug. On several cases, tuner_type
>>>> information came from
>>>> some sort of autodetection schema, but the proper setup is not
>>>> sent to tuner.
>>>>
>>>> Please test the enclosed patch. It warrants that
>>>> TUNER_SET_TYPE_ADDR is called
>>>> at saa7134_board_init2() for all those boards:
>>>>
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_ADS_DUO_CARDBUS_PTV331
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_ASUS_EUROPA2_HYBRID
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_ASUSTeK_P7131_DUAL
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_ASUSTeK_P7131_HYBRID_LNA
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_AVERMEDIA_SUPER_007
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_BEHOLD_COLUMBUS_TVFM
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_BMK_MPEX_NOTUNER
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_BMK_MPEX_TUNER
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_CINERGY_HT_PCI
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_CINERGY_HT_PCMCIA
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_CREATIX_CTX953
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_FLYDVBT_HYBRID_CARDBUS
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_FLYDVB_TRIO
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_HAUPPAUGE_HVR1110
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_KWORLD_ATSC110
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_KWORLD_DVBT_210
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_MD7134
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_MEDION_MD8800_QUADRO
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_PHILIPS_EUROPA
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_PHILIPS_TIGER
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_PHILIPS_TIGER_S
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_PINNACLE_PCTV_310i
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_TEVION_DVBT_220RF
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_TWINHAN_DTV_DVB_3056
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_VIDEOMATE_DVBT_200
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_VIDEOMATE_DVBT_200A
>>>> SAA7134_BOARD_VIDEOMATE_DVBT_300
>>>>
>>>> It is important to test the above boards, to be sure that no
>>>> regression is
>>>> caused.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
>>>>
>>>> diff -r 60110897e86a
>>>> linux/drivers/media/video/saa7134/saa7134-cards.c
>>>> --- a/linux/drivers/media/video/saa7134/saa7134-cards.c Fri Apr 25
>>>> 08:04:54 2008 -0300
>>>> +++ b/linux/drivers/media/video/saa7134/saa7134-cards.c Fri Apr 25
>>>> 10:44:16 2008 -0300
>>>>
>>> Mauro,
>>>
>>> I didn't review your patch yet, and it needs to be tested, however,
>>> the bug reported in this thread deals with the same regression that
>>> you are attempting to repair, but on the cx88 driver -- not the
>>> saa7134 driver.
>>>
>>> Both drivers need to be tested to make sure that this regression has
>>> been fixed.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, this is a cx88 version. Of course, needs testing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
>>
>> diff -r 5c9a4decb57b linux/drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-cards.c
>> --- a/linux/drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-cards.c Fri Apr 25
>> 11:02:29 2008 -0300
>> +++ b/linux/drivers/media/video/cx88/cx88-cards.c Fri Apr 25
>> 12:01:48 2008 -0300
>> @@ -2495,26 +2495,27 @@
>>
>>
> This does not make a difference for me:
>
> tuner' 1-0043: chip found @ 0x86 (cx88[0])
> tda9887 1-0043: tda988[5/6/7] found
> All bytes are equal. It is not a TEA5767
> tuner' 1-0060: chip found @ 0xc0 (cx88[0])
> tuner-simple 1-0060: type set to 44 (Philips 4 in 1 (ATI TV Wonder
> Pro/Conexant))
> cx88[0]: Leadtek Winfast 2000XP Expert config: tuner=38, eeprom[0]=0x01
> input: cx88 IR (Leadtek Winfast 2000XP as /class/input/input6
> cx88[0]/0: found at 0000:00:0a.0, rev: 5, irq: 18, latency: 32, mmio:
> 0xe2000000
> cx88[0]/0: registered device video0 [v4l2]
> cx88[0]/0: registered device vbi0
> cx88[0]/0: registered device radio0
>
>
> The wrong tuner type has already been set, before the eeprom with the
> correct tuner type is read.
>
The following quick and dirty patch fixes the problem for me:
--- cx88-cards.c.orig 2008-04-17 04:49:44.000000000 +0200
+++ cx88-cards.c 2008-04-25 18:57:16.000000000 +0200
@@ -2197,12 +2197,13 @@
cx88_card_setup_pre_i2c(core);
cx88_i2c_init(core, pci);
+ cx88_card_setup(core);
+
/* load tuner module, if needed */
if (TUNER_ABSENT != core->board.tuner_type)
request_module("tuner");
cx88_call_i2c_clients (core, TUNER_SET_STANDBY, NULL);
- cx88_card_setup(core);
cx88_ir_init(core, pci);
return core;
It makes sure that cx88_card_setup(), which reads the eeprom, is run
before the tuner modules is loaded.
Gert
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-25 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-19 20:57 Hauppauge WinTV regreession from 2.6.24 to 2.6.25 Ian Pickworth
2008-04-20 0:47 ` hermann pitton
2008-04-20 9:15 ` Ian Pickworth
2008-04-20 11:20 ` Gert Vervoort
2008-04-20 12:26 ` Ian Pickworth
2008-04-20 13:06 ` hermann pitton
2008-04-20 16:18 ` Gert Vervoort
2008-04-20 21:16 ` hermann pitton
2008-04-24 3:55 ` hermann pitton
2008-04-25 13:56 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-25 14:40 ` Michael Krufky
2008-04-25 14:45 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-25 15:06 ` mkrufky
2008-04-25 21:48 ` hermann pitton
2008-04-25 23:41 ` hermann pitton
2008-04-26 11:59 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-26 12:58 ` Ian Pickworth
2008-04-26 14:06 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-26 22:10 ` hermann pitton
2008-04-26 23:19 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-27 20:15 ` hermann pitton
2008-04-27 21:18 ` [linux-dvb] " Hartmut Hackmann
2008-04-28 1:01 ` hermann pitton
2008-04-28 14:21 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-28 14:14 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-25 15:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-25 16:55 ` Gert Vervoort
2008-04-25 17:02 ` Gert Vervoort [this message]
[not found] ` <20080426090725.4a0fdcd4@gaivota>
2008-04-26 14:23 ` Gert Vervoort
2008-04-26 15:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2008-04-26 16:59 ` Gert Vervoort
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48120EA0.4020704@hccnet.nl \
--to=gert.vervoort@hccnet.nl \
--cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
--cc=mkrufky@linuxtv.org \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox