From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net ([167.206.4.198]) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1K8Jd9-0006e4-RS for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:40:40 +0200 Received: from steven-toths-macbook-pro.local (ool-18bfe594.dyn.optonline.net [24.191.229.148]) by mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0K2K00MLAJUNBHB0@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:40:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:39:59 -0400 From: Steven Toth In-reply-to: <20080615190958.GA6792@opus.istwok.net> To: David Engel Message-id: <4856B37F.20704@linuxtv.org> MIME-version: 1.0 References: <20080613163914.GA31437@opus.istwok.net> <4852AB58.9010806@linuxtv.org> <20080615190958.GA6792@opus.istwok.net> Cc: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] A couple HVR-1800 questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: David Engel wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 01:16:08PM -0400, Steven Toth wrote: >> David Engel wrote: >>> First, what is the status of the analog capture capability? My search >>> ... >> The analog encoder is running with the tree form linuxtv.org. It has >> some cleanup video ioctl2 rework going on by another dev here, but it's >> functional as is. It's usable today. > > Thanks for the repsonse, Steven. > >>> Second, as far as I can tell, the hardware can perform simultaneous >>> analog and digital captures. Is that correct and, if so, does/will >>> the Linux driver support it? >> Yes and yes. >> >> Typically the analog video devices are exposed as /dev/video0 (analog >> preview) /dev/video1 (encoder output) and /dev/dvb/... for the digital >> side. > > Excellent. > > Regarding the encoder and preview devices, that's different than the > ivtv convention of using /dev/video(N) and and /dev/video(N+16). Is > there a reason you did it differently and should it be standardized > across drivers? Hi david, This is how the cx88 driver model works. Pfft, who needs standards ;) - Steve _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb