From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m66E5meN029260 for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2008 10:05:48 -0400 Received: from smtp6.versatel.nl (smtp6.versatel.nl [62.58.50.97]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m66E5Huc025458 for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2008 10:05:17 -0400 Message-ID: <4870D2A5.4050703@hhs.nl> Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2008 16:11:49 +0200 From: Hans de Goede MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thierry Merle References: <48706115.5050707@hhs.nl> <4870B694.5010101@free.fr> In-Reply-To: <4870B694.5010101@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com, v4l2 library Subject: Re: PATCH: libv4l-sync-with-0.3.3-release.patch List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Thierry Merle wrote: > Hans de Goede a écrit : >> Hi, >> >> This patch syncs mercurial with the 0.3.3 tarbal I've just released. >> note, please "hg add" all the files under appl-patches, you forgot this >> the last time, so these files are not in mercurial yet. >> >> Let me know if you want this split up in 3 or 4 incremental patches. >> > I would prefer next time since this would help to avoid forgotten things like the appl-patches/ directory. > I checked with your own 0.3.2 archive but found no difference so I stated my imports OK. > > Do you send these patches to the application maintainers? Once libv4l has proven itself the vlc patch will be sent to vlc (its libvlc specific), as for the other 2 patches, there upstreams are very much dead I'm afraid. Regards, Hans -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list