From: Andrea <audetto@tiscali.it>
To: video4linux-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: A question about VIDIOC_DQBUF
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:02:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <487678F6.50609@tiscali.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4873E6D0.8050202@tiscali.it>
Is there anybody who could help my with the followin?
I would like to know if my interpretation of VIDIOC_DQBUF is correct.
Thanks
Andrea wrote:
> Andrea wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to understand better the way VIDIOC_DQBUF works.
>>
> ...
>> Is the following correct?
>>
>> - First, an application queues a buffer, then it dequeues the buffer.
>> - Then again, a buffer is queued and then dequeued.
>> - Dequeuing a buffer blocks is the buffer is not ready (unless device
>> opened with O_NONBLOCK).
>> - Trying to dequeue a buffer without queuing it first is an error, and
>> the ioctl VIDIOC_DQBUF should return -EINVAL.
>
> Moreover:
>
> - One can only VIDIOC_DQBUF after calling STREAMON. Before it should
> return -EINVAL? Block?
> - After calling STREAMOFF, VIDIOC_DQBUF should return -EINVAL
>
>>
>> <- end of question ->
>>
>> Now, about pwc: (if the above is correct).
>>
>> 1) VIDIOC_DQBUF blocks always until a buffer is ready, regardless of
>> O_NONBLOCK.
>> 2) VIDIOC_DQBUF does not check if a buffer has been previously queued.
>> Moreover VIDIOC_QBUF is almost a no-op. It has no way to check if a
>> buffer has been queued before VIDIOC_DQBUF.
>>
>> If I have understood correctly (very unlikely), this is the reason why
>> mplayer hangs while stopping the stream with pwc:
>>
>> while (!ioctl(priv->video_fd, VIDIOC_DQBUF, &buf));
>>
>
> This code is not needed because STREAMOFF flushes the buffer queue. Does
> it not?
>
>> This code should eventually return -EINVAL, while pwc just blocks
>> waiting for the next buffer (which never arrives because
>> VIDIOC_STREAMOFF has been called).
>
> pwc should return -EINVAL to all ioctl calls after STREAMOFF?
>
> Could someone please tell me where I am right and where I am wrong...
>
> What is the reference implementation? vivi? em28xx?
>
> Andrea
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-10 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-08 20:18 A question about VIDIOC_DQBUF Andrea
2008-07-08 22:14 ` Andrea
2008-07-10 21:02 ` Andrea [this message]
2008-07-11 7:31 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2008-07-11 20:03 ` Andrea
[not found] ` <c8b4dbe10807090704t4e98b8cu253fab39a9dd81d@mail.gmail.com>
2008-07-11 19:17 ` Andrea
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=487678F6.50609@tiscali.it \
--to=audetto@tiscali.it \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox