From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-in-05.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.45]) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KHJXh-0002Aj-SN for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:24:14 +0200 Received: from mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.28]) by mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AEE1834F4 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:24:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (mail-in-02.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.42]) by mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DF53465A8 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:24:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server2.zuhause.xx (dslb-088-072-250-232.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.72.250.232]) by mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8DB27ECB for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:24:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.32] (az.zuhause.xx [192.168.1.32]) by server2.zuhause.xx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B2AD6B25 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:24:19 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48776CD9.1040502@server> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:23:21 +0200 From: laasa MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: [linux-dvb] Re : Re : How to get 2 TT3650-CI working List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: > Talking about the patch from dominik: is it normal that the registers = > settings are different than those from TT-3200 (in budget-ci.c)? I mean = > it is the same chips (stb0899/stb6100), so is it possible to use those = > settings directly with a TT 3200; I have reception problems for some = > transponders, and a lot of other users also, so if those settings are = > OK to try I guess that's something I am ready to do to improve things. > Also I saw that the patch touches stb0899/6100 files in the frontends = > dir, so my question: are these changes there to improve tuning also or = > just related to the support of the other cards? > Thx > Bye > Manu = I have test this week the locking of my tt3650ci with the hg from the end o= f last wheek (7215) plus pctv452e-patch. I cant see any locking problems but I have a very simple configuration (onl= y one satelite: ASTRA 19,2=B0E, most channels on horizontal high-band). Why the pctv452e-module use different settings for STB0899 and STB6100 I do= nt know, sorry. When I compare the actual driver with the driver I have used the last month= s (version from february) I think the locking is much faster. *But back to the problem in the headline:* When anyone have the same problem with 2 or more TT3600 or TT3650CI hopeful= ly the solution is to decrease the count of urb's (USB request block). When I change in line 1058 of file pctv452e.c from ".count =3D 7;" to ".cou= nt =3D 4" it works for me. Hopefully it helps other. Best regards, laasa. _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb