Re: [PATCH 03/04] videobuf: Add physically contiguous queue code V2

[Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@teltonika.lt>]

Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 6:33 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Paulius Zaleckas wrote:
>>
>>> Magnus Damm wrote:
>>>> This is V2 of the physically contiguous videobuf queues patch.
>>>> Useful for hardware such as the SuperH Mobile CEU which doesn't
>>>> support scatter gatter bus mastering.
>> [snip]
>>
>>>> +   /* Try to remap memory */
>>>> +
>>>> +   size = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
>>>> +   size = (size < mem->size) ? size : mem->size;
>>>> +
>>>> +   vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_noncached(vma->vm_page_prot);
>>>> +   retval = remap_pfn_range(vma, vma->vm_start,
>>>> +                            __pa(mem->vaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT,
>>> __pa(mem->vaddr) doesn't work on ARM architecture... It is a long story
>>> about handling memory allocations and mapping for ARM (there is
>>> dma_mmap_coherent to deal with this), but there is a workaround:
>>>
>>> mem->dma_handle >> PAGE_SHIFT,
>>>
>>> It is safe to do it this way and also saves some CPU instructions :)
>> Paulius, even if the story is so long, could you perhaps point us to some
>> ML-threads or elaborate a bit? I did find one example in
>> drivers/media/video/atmel-isi.c (not in mainline), just would be
>> interesting to find out more.
>>
>> Magnus, have you investigated this further?
> 
> Both (__pa(mem->vaddr) >> PAGE_SHIFT) and (mem->dma_handle >>
> PAGE_SHIFT) work well with the current dma_alloc_coherent()
> implementation on SuperH. I do however lean towards using
> __pa(mem->vaddr) over mem->dma_handle, since I suspect that
> mem->dma_handle doesn't have to be a physical address.
> 
> Paul, any thoughts about this? Can we assume that the dma_handle
> returned from dma_alloc_coherent() is a physical address, or is it
> better to use __pa() on the virtual address to get the pfn?

Well dma_alloc_coherent() is supposed to return physically contiguous
memory physical address in dma_handle... Quick look at LXR didn't show
any architecture where it shouldn't work... but it showed that ARM and
possibly FRV(?) won't work with __pa() since these architectures are
allocating from different memory pool than kmalloc()

--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list