From: stuart <stuart@xnet.com>
To: video4linux-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Kworld 120 tuner - what should I expect?
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:02:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <488120FF.2030402@xnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <487F495A.10806@xnet.com>
stuart wrote:
>
> Hi...
>
> I just installed a Kworld 120 (the successor to the Kworld 115 & 110
> ATSC tuners) into a Debian mythtv box. I am using a recent (several
> days old) version of v4l (pulled using Hg).
>
> Things appear to be running, however I still can not tune in any ATSC
> stations (another mythtv box split off the same antenna is receiving
> over a dozen ATSC stations). I have not even tried to get the Kworld
> 120 NTSC tuner working.
>
> As Kworld 120 support is new, I was wondering what to expect. There have
> been threads pointing out this new and very different version of Kworld
> tuners has to be rebooted in order to switch between tuning ATSC and
> NTSC signals. I wonder if that is still true. And, if anything, what
> else I should expect.
>
> Also, what are the best tools to configure & test this type of hardware
> and how do you use them? Running through mythtv-setup every iteration
> does take time.
>
> ...thanks
>
I know working off of "v4l dvb staging" is risky business, but I'm
trying to get the new Kworld 120 tuner (replacement for the old Kworld
115 and older yet Kworld 110 tuner) to work.
I'm running a scan (which I assume is the old scandvb?? which I can't
find anymore) on both of my mythtv Debian boxes. My master back end has
a Kworld 110 and my newer slave front end has a Kworld 120 card. I'm
only running "v4l dvb staging" on the newer slave front end.
The scan output on the master back end shows 33 services. While the
scan output on the new slave front end shows 0 services. I should next
check the antenna hook up on the slave front end - but, if anything, it
should be a good +3dB better then the slave back end (having one less
splitter).
I would appreciate hearing from anyone who has had success with the
Kworld 120 in a mythtv box.
...thanks.
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-18 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-17 13:30 Kworld 120 tuner - what should I expect? stuart
2008-07-18 23:02 ` stuart [this message]
2008-07-24 19:19 ` stuart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=488120FF.2030402@xnet.com \
--to=stuart@xnet.com \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox