From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6KEIar0019160 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:18:36 -0400 Received: from mail.hauppauge.com (mail.hauppauge.com [167.206.143.4]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6KEIOaR017191 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:18:24 -0400 Message-ID: <48834928.6080207@linuxtv.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:18:16 -0400 From: Michael Krufky MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Verkuil References: <200807181625.12619.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> <200807201447.35659.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200807201447.35659.hverkuil@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: An example for RFC: Add support to query and change connections inside a media device List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Hans Verkuil wrote: > As usual, comments are welcome. Why /dev/v4l/foo and not /dev/media/foo? I think "v4l" is a poor choice -- v4l refers to video4linux, but Linux-DVB is it's own subsystem and its own branding. If you want to be all-encompassing, then I think that "media" is a much better choice than "v4l". -Mike -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list