From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6QE9kax029506 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:09:46 -0400 Received: from nlpi053.prodigy.net (nlpi053.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.82]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6QE9Yoa026099 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:09:34 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.201] (adsl-75-4-155-229.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net [75.4.155.229]) (authenticated bits=0) by nlpi053.prodigy.net (8.13.8 smtpauth/dk/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6QE9NLp002613 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:09:28 -0500 Message-ID: <488B3012.3080004@xnet.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:09:22 -0500 From: stuart MIME-Version: 1.0 To: video4linux-list@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: IR remote control support for kworld 120??? List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Hi... I understand the new kworld 120 (replacement for the kworld 115 and 110) is not supported w.r.t. IR remote control. So... Was digging through the v4l code (staging from last week) and happened upon a "fixme note" w.r.t. the cx23885 chip. At about line 550 in cx23885-cards.c there appears to be an unimplemented IR method for initializing the cx23885. Does that mean there is no IR remote control support for any cx2388 based board? I was hoping to find that all that was needed to get the kworld 120's IR remote working was the right connections into such IR methods. (Yeah, I know, if it was that easy then the original kworld 120 author (thank you to him) would have done it.) ...thanks -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list