From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m6QEF3aL030994 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:15:03 -0400 Received: from nlpi053.prodigy.net (nlpi053.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.36.82]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m6QEEqIa028389 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2008 10:14:52 -0400 Message-ID: <488B3155.3060109@xnet.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 09:14:45 -0500 From: stuart MIME-Version: 1.0 To: video4linux-list@redhat.com References: <488B3012.3080004@xnet.com> In-Reply-To: <488B3012.3080004@xnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: IR remote control support for kworld 120??? List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: stuart wrote: > Hi... > > I understand the new kworld 120 (replacement for the kworld 115 and 110) > is not supported w.r.t. IR remote control. > > So... > > Was digging through the v4l code (staging from last week) and happened > upon a "fixme note" w.r.t. the cx23885 chip. At about line 550 in > cx23885-cards.c there appears to be an unimplemented IR method for > initializing the cx23885. Does that mean there is no IR remote control > support for any cx2388 based board? I was hoping to find that all that > was needed to get the kworld 120's IR remote working was the right > connections into such IR methods. (Yeah, I know, if it was that easy > then the original kworld 120 author (thank you to him) would have done it.) I meant that as a sincere thank you as in: "...thank you, I appreciate all the hard work you put into the kworld 120 driver...", just to be clear. > ...thanks > -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list