From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net ([167.206.4.196]) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KTfkj-0008AX-5B for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 18:32:47 +0200 Received: from steven-toths-macbook-pro.local (ool-18bfe594.dyn.optonline.net [24.191.229.148]) by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0K5L0008GN9KCI50@mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:32:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:32:07 -0400 From: Steven Toth In-reply-to: To: Brandon Jenkins Message-id: <48A45E07.2080006@linuxtv.org> MIME-version: 1.0 References: Cc: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] HVR-1600 - mxl5005s - QAM scanning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: Brandon Jenkins wrote: > Greetings all, > > The last time I tried scanning for QAM it didn't work. If I recall, it > would be a while before the driver could be looked at. Has there been > any change in status worth testing out again? None that I'm aware of. QAM is working but it's underperforming on sensitivity by about 10-15%. It's a driver issue to be resolved. It's working pretty well on all the testing I've ever done. - Steve _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb