From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from [84.77.67.98] (helo=ventoso.org) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Kj83V-0006pY-AR for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:48:03 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ventoso.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D388CE72CF for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:47:56 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48DC93AA.6010406@ventoso.org> Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:47:54 +0200 From: Luca Olivetti MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-dvb References: <48DBBF16.7030603@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <48DBBF16.7030603@gmx.net> Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] RE : [RFC] Let the future decide between the two. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: En/na P. van Gaans ha escrit: > > I still can't help thinking that if I wouldn't have asked why the AF9005 > driver a while ago wasn't in hg yet it STILL wouldn't be in hg. [.....] > I think there are even several driver developers who don't know they > have to send a pull request but assume this happens automagically when > it's known on the list that there is a working driver. That was the case for the af9005: I didn't know how to properly do it (in part because many of my queries went unanswered). Bye -- Luca _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb