From: Steven Toth <stoth@linuxtv.org>
To: Scott Bronson <bronson@rinspin.com>
Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Unreliable tuning with HVR-950q
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:43:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EA3216.90407@linuxtv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9d87242f0810011146r7c2b2083pdd7d940f4c427382@mail.gmail.com>
Scott Bronson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Scott Bronson <bronson@rinspin.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Steven Toth <stoth@linuxtv.org> wrote:
>>> You're overwhelming the tuner/demod
>>> frontend with high RF levels.
>> The attenuators are in the mail, 3dB and 6dB... I'll report back when
>> I've tried them.
>
> I've now tried the attenuators. Verdict: didn't help.
>
> 3dB: no difference that I can detect.
> 6dB: probably a little worse
> 3dB+6dB in line: definitely worse
>
> If I was overwhelming the tuner, wouldn't it have a hard time keeping
> the lock too? Because once my 950q locks, it keeps it rock-solid
> forever, perfect video. It's just getting it in the first place
> that's hard.
No, not necessarily. My comments to you were based on the fact that
you're 1 mile from the broadcast antenna. Assuming your antenna is in
good shape then I'd expect the hvr950q to be a great choice. It's got
great sensitivity (xc5000 + AU8522) and I use it all the time (for
digital cable).
Good result btw.
We've also done extensive testing on ATSC and we have no obvious issues.
>
> My Pinnacle PCTV HD works 100% perfectly connected to the same
> antenna. Locks every time, excellent video for hours. No problems.
Hmm. Maybe we really are talking about a bad stick. Can you try this in
a windows box?
I'd expect the performance to be the same under Linux and Windows. If it
isn't then we have driver issues.
Can you try this?
>
> Does anybody else have a 950q? Does it work? To me, it appears that
> either its tuner is junk or the Linux driver needs some work. I guess
> my next step is to set up a Windows machine and try it there.
We _do_ have rock solid HVR950q support for digital, on lots of
platforms in various locations.
Based on the facts so far it's probably something specific to your
stick, your location or your testing. Try windows and report back if you
can.
Regards,
Steve
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-06 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-19 21:25 Unreliable tuning with HVR-950q Scott Bronson
2008-09-19 21:28 ` Devin Heitmueller
2008-09-20 3:05 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-20 5:55 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-20 6:37 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-21 20:16 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-22 2:28 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-22 19:06 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-22 19:22 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-23 6:35 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-23 15:14 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-26 16:52 ` Scott Bronson
2008-10-01 18:46 ` Scott Bronson
2008-10-06 15:43 ` Steven Toth [this message]
2008-10-06 15:53 ` Devin Heitmueller
2008-10-06 15:57 ` Steven Toth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48EA3216.90407@linuxtv.org \
--to=stoth@linuxtv.org \
--cc=bronson@rinspin.com \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox