From: Steven Toth <stoth@linuxtv.org>
To: Devin Heitmueller <devin.heitmueller@gmail.com>
Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Unreliable tuning with HVR-950q
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:57:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EA3555.6060104@linuxtv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <412bdbff0810060853k6925b37ax6801943d6b31bf61@mail.gmail.com>
Devin Heitmueller wrote:
> Hello Steven,
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Steven Toth <stoth@linuxtv.org> wrote:
>>> Does anybody else have a 950q? Does it work? To me, it appears that
>>> either its tuner is junk or the Linux driver needs some work. I guess
>>> my next step is to set up a Windows machine and try it there.
>> We _do_ have rock solid HVR950q support for digital, on lots of platforms in
>> various locations.
>>
>> Based on the facts so far it's probably something specific to your stick,
>> your location or your testing. Try windows and report back if you can.
>
> Just an FYI: I'm actively debugging an issue with xc5000 signal lock
> that looks like some sort of timing issue. I found that some fixes I
> made in my local tree to optimize time to lock resulted in getting
> lock *much* faster in many cases, but failing entirely in others.
> When it works, I get lock in 330ms; when it fails I don't get lock
> even when polling the demod at 100ms interval for 2 seconds.
>
> I'm doing this on a Pinnacle 801e (xc5000/s5h1411) and not a HVR-950q,
> but it's possible it's the same issue.
>
> Will report back when I have isolated the problem.
Good to know, thanks Devin.
- Steve
--
video4linux-list mailing list
Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-06 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-19 21:25 Unreliable tuning with HVR-950q Scott Bronson
2008-09-19 21:28 ` Devin Heitmueller
2008-09-20 3:05 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-20 5:55 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-20 6:37 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-21 20:16 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-22 2:28 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-22 19:06 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-22 19:22 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-23 6:35 ` Scott Bronson
2008-09-23 15:14 ` Steven Toth
2008-09-26 16:52 ` Scott Bronson
2008-10-01 18:46 ` Scott Bronson
2008-10-06 15:43 ` Steven Toth
2008-10-06 15:53 ` Devin Heitmueller
2008-10-06 15:57 ` Steven Toth [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48EA3555.6060104@linuxtv.org \
--to=stoth@linuxtv.org \
--cc=devin.heitmueller@gmail.com \
--cc=video4linux-list@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox