From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m96FvWUx017151 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:57:32 -0400 Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.197]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m96FvAJM023554 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2008 11:57:10 -0400 Received: from steven-toths-macbook-pro.local (ool-18bfe594.dyn.optonline.net [24.191.229.148]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0K8B003YEQZ9BFB0@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for video4linux-list@redhat.com; Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:57:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:57:09 -0400 From: Steven Toth In-reply-to: <412bdbff0810060853k6925b37ax6801943d6b31bf61@mail.gmail.com> To: Devin Heitmueller Message-id: <48EA3555.6060104@linuxtv.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <9d87242f0809191425p1adb1e59p417753a4c403a872@mail.gmail.com> <9d87242f0809211316g1a34f0e7wed0f8345d5cdd787@mail.gmail.com> <48D702B5.8020800@linuxtv.org> <9d87242f0809221206n1d589137v8e1bf77792c31bcf@mail.gmail.com> <48D7F064.4010103@linuxtv.org> <9d87242f0809222335l67860769k6369db5665b10f98@mail.gmail.com> <48D907BB.4020801@linuxtv.org> <9d87242f0809260952h7542a051ud6d539269638d6b4@mail.gmail.com> <9d87242f0810011146r7c2b2083pdd7d940f4c427382@mail.gmail.com> <48EA3216.90407@linuxtv.org> <412bdbff0810060853k6925b37ax6801943d6b31bf61@mail.gmail.com> Cc: video4linux-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: Unreliable tuning with HVR-950q List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Devin Heitmueller wrote: > Hello Steven, > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Steven Toth wrote: >>> Does anybody else have a 950q? Does it work? To me, it appears that >>> either its tuner is junk or the Linux driver needs some work. I guess >>> my next step is to set up a Windows machine and try it there. >> We _do_ have rock solid HVR950q support for digital, on lots of platforms in >> various locations. >> >> Based on the facts so far it's probably something specific to your stick, >> your location or your testing. Try windows and report back if you can. > > Just an FYI: I'm actively debugging an issue with xc5000 signal lock > that looks like some sort of timing issue. I found that some fixes I > made in my local tree to optimize time to lock resulted in getting > lock *much* faster in many cases, but failing entirely in others. > When it works, I get lock in 330ms; when it fails I don't get lock > even when polling the demod at 100ms interval for 2 seconds. > > I'm doing this on a Pinnacle 801e (xc5000/s5h1411) and not a HVR-950q, > but it's possible it's the same issue. > > Will report back when I have isolated the problem. Good to know, thanks Devin. - Steve -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list