From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.225.205]) by www.linuxtv.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KspyK-00047R-2G for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 04:30:50 +0200 Message-ID: <48FFE1B1.80403@rogers.com> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:30:09 -0400 From: CityK MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: [linux-dvb] [PATCH] Add syntek corp device to au0828 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: Mark Kimsal wrote: > mkrufky wrote: > > can you give me the exact name of the device (from the retail package) ? > As per my other email (sabrent/auvitek unknown usb device) I'm not > entirely > sure of the brand name. The Web store lists it as "sabrent". lsusb says > it's "syntek", but Windows and the device manager says it's an "auvitek". > The box has literally no brand name. The only "brand" looking things are > just acronyms like NTSC and ATSC. The windows .inf file for the driver is > littered with the words "auvitek international", "copyright auvitek" and the > like.... > > Although I didn't buy the device, the first brand name that I identified would > be "auvitek". Sabrent was only found after back tracking to the the retailer > and seeing the product page. I don't think that "Syntek" is the proper > coporation for the usb vendor ID of 05e1. http://www.linuxtv.org/wiki/index.php/Sabrent_TV-USBHD mkrufky wrote: > I thought this stick had an MT2130 inside -- looks like you've got > another revision with a TDA18271... very interesting :-) I believe that the AnyTV sticks, from Shenzhen Forward Video, are configured with the MT213x part too. _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb