From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mADNwTdH019479 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:58:29 -0500 Received: from smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp103.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.81]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id mADNwGk9016706 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:58:16 -0500 Message-ID: <491CBF15.90401@rogers.com> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:58:13 -0500 From: CityK MIME-Version: 1.0 To: V4L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: USB Capture device List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Keith Lawson wrote: > I've been on this list for a while now and have noticed that it's pretty > well strictly developer related. Most user questions about supported > devices seem to go unanswered. Is there a better forum for users to ask > questions about Linux support for video devices? Developers are in short supply. Users tend to just ask their particular question and never return. So unanswered support questions are the unfortunate consequence. (A lot of users seem to expect a lot too --- some how I think that they may have an image of an elf workshop, were developers go about working for no other apparent reason then just to produce drivers) > I didn't catch the final descision on splitting the mailing list. Is a > video4linux-users list coming? > There has been no further discussion on the matter.....things make wide turns around here, as opposed to on a dime -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list