From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from crow.cadsoft.de ([217.86.189.86] helo=raven.cadsoft.de) by www.linuxtv.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1L4eH8-0008NM-0f for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:27:03 +0100 Received: from [192.168.100.10] (hawk.cadsoft.de [192.168.100.10]) by raven.cadsoft.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mAOGQsDj007557 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:26:56 +0100 Message-ID: <492AD5CD.7050107@cadsoft.de> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:26:53 +0100 From: Klaus Schmidinger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-dvb@linuxtv.org References: <13502.130.36.62.140.1227543276.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <13502.130.36.62.140.1227543276.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] [PATCH] Add missing S2 caps flag to S2API List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: On 24.11.2008 17:14, Niels Wagenaar wrote: > Op Ma, 24 november, 2008 16:59, schreef VDR User: >> If the multiproto method is superior, which it certainly seems to be, >> why can't that method be adopted into s2api? It seems silly that this >> problem hasn't been addressed in the conception of s2api. >> > > Is multiproto superior? Perhaps on several points it's indeed better or > more complete. But then again, it was allready 2 years in development so > it's bound to have additional enhancements which S2API doesn't have atm. > > But then again, we're comparing multiproto with S2API which was build from > the ground in just little over 3 months. So yeah, it doesn't have it all. > >>>From my personal POV. I think S2API isn't missing something concerning > tuning. The latest VDR 1.7.0 patch (which I made available on 7-10), still > works in my configuration. And I heard from several others that it works > for them also. Even after updating the v4l repo to the latest editions. So > DVB tuning works with S2API. > > So, what we're missing are enhancements! Well, we can add that since it's > OpenSource and all. So add it allready instead of complaining ;) Well, I did - but apparently nobody cares... :-( Klaus _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb