From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mBI9HMRm007167 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:17:22 -0500 Received: from co203.xi-lite.net (co203.xi-lite.net [149.6.83.203]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBI9H5Ip032042 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:17:05 -0500 Message-ID: <494A150F.6010602@parrot.com> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:17:03 +0100 From: Matthieu CASTET MIME-Version: 1.0 To: video4linux-list@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski Subject: soc-camera : add new flags List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: video4linux-list-bounces@redhat.com List-ID: Hi, I am trying to use soc-camera for our camera IP. Our IP allow to chose if the synchronization is done according to ITU-R BT601 or ITU-R BT656. Can new flag be added to negotiate the synchronization standard between host and sensor. Our IP also allow to select if the data on the bus is transmitted on the CbYCrY order or YCbYCr order. Can new flag be added to negotiate the synchronization standard between host and sensor. Thanks Matthieu -- video4linux-list mailing list Unsubscribe mailto:video4linux-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/video4linux-list