From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from smtp110.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.120]) by www.linuxtv.org with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LH5Fp-0000tF-5h for linux-dvb@linuxtv.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2008 00:41:06 +0100 Message-ID: <49580E67.5040906@rogers.com> Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:40:23 -0500 From: CityK MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rudy@grumpydevil.homelinux.org References: <1230505364.23623.45.camel@poledra.romunt.nl> <1230506668.23623.60.camel@poledra.romunt.nl> In-Reply-To: <1230506668.23623.60.camel@poledra.romunt.nl> Cc: Thijs Wennekes , linux-dvb@linuxtv.org Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] HVR-2200 progress List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-dvb-bounces@linuxtv.org Errors-To: linux-dvb-bounces+mchehab=infradead.org@linuxtv.org List-ID: Rudy Zijlstra wrote: > Op zondag 28-12-2008 om 17:07 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Mark Jenks: > >> Your best bet would be the 1600. >> > > The 1600 seems USA only. Cannot find it in Europe, unless they call it > 1700 here, as the 1700 seems to have simmilar spec, but Europe minded. Correct, the HVR-1600 is for the ATSC market, and I do indeed believe that the HVR-1700 is the analogous product targeted to the DVB-T market. > >> the 2200 has been on hold for way too long. >> > > Agreeing on this :( Do note that Steve provided an update 10 days ago (granted the message was for the analogous ATSC device, but the unfortunate crux of the message will apply here as well): http://marc.info/?l=linux-dvb&m=122961870514728&w=2 _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@linuxtv.org http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb